Coast Resorts Open Roads Forum: Rivian Electric Truck takes on the Ike Gauntlet
Open Roads Forum Already a member? Login here.   If not, Register Today!  |  Help

Newest  |  Active  |  Popular  |  RVing FAQ Forum Rules  |  Forum Posting Help and Support  |  Contact  

Search:   Advanced Search

Search only in Tow Vehicles

Open Roads Forum  >  Tow Vehicles

 > Rivian Electric Truck takes on the Ike Gauntlet

Reply to Topic  |  Subscribe  |  Print Page  |  Post New Topic  | 
Page of 17  
Prev  |  Next
BCSnob

Middletown, MD

Senior Member

Joined: 02/23/2002

View Profile



Posted: 02/04/22 11:05am Link  |  Quote  |  Print  |  Notify Moderator

And the tax rate is not tied to inflation which means as road repairs cost more the tax being collected is not increasing.

Cummins12V98

on the road

Senior Member

Joined: 06/03/2012

View Profile


Offline
Posted: 02/04/22 11:18am Link  |  Quote  |  Print  |  Notify Moderator

FishOnOne wrote:

Cummins12V98 wrote:

"For his use, the 95cc+ ported smoky stinky 2-stroke work wonders"

That simply is a Barbra Streisand statement!!! Modern 2 stroke engines burn very clean. Especially if they use 100-1 AMZ/OIL 2 cycle oil like I do. Simply no smell or smoke.

But hey if your vehicle doesn't emit them it must be clean and green right??????


[image]


NICE!!!


2015 RAM LongHorn 3500 Dually CrewCab 4X4 CUMMINS/AISIN RearAir 385HP/865TQ 4:10's
37,800# GCVWR "Towing Beast"

"HeavyWeight" B&W RVK3600

2016 MobileSuites 39TKSB3 highly "Elited" In the stable

2007.5 Mobile Suites 36 SB3 29,000# Combined SOLD

Cummins12V98

on the road

Senior Member

Joined: 06/03/2012

View Profile


Offline
Posted: 02/04/22 11:25am Link  |  Quote  |  Print  |  Notify Moderator

BCSnob wrote:

And the tax rate is not tied to inflation which means as road repairs cost more the tax being collected is not increasing.


The problem is when you suck $$$ out of the fuel tax to pay for light rail, park and ride facilities and buses the road fund gets the short end of the stick. Subsidizing EV's does not help either so then they want to start charging you by the mile. Bottom line the average person get's screwed again and the minority wins.

Thermoguy

Graham, WA

Senior Member

Joined: 01/04/2017

View Profile



Good Sam RV Club Member

Offline
Posted: 02/04/22 11:59am Link  |  Quote  |  Print  |  Notify Moderator

ksss wrote:

Thermoguy wrote:

Grit dog wrote:

time2roll wrote:

specta wrote:

And how much in road taxes are the people who drive electric cars paying??

Why am I paving the way for them?
https://www.myev.com/research/interestin........ge-extra-fees-to-own-an-electric-vehicle


Using WA as an example since I know the gas tax. The EV fee = approx 300 gal worth of gas tax collected.
If I assume EV ers were already driving a 30mpg car, that is the equivalent of an average of 9000 miles per year.
Just a 5 day a week reasonable commute here = approx 15,000 mi per year plus other non commuting miles.
WA is still giving EV owners a big break on gas tax overall I’d say.


In WA state - House Bill 2026 will be introduced this year to discuss how to initiate a road usage charge. This is a pay by mile tax that is expected to start in 2024-25. I was part of a 1 year study where I installed a GPS tracker in my car. They could show me how many miles I drove in each state I visited. Since I drive to OR and ID often, this made sense to me and I wanted the study to see that not everyone commutes to and from the same place. The state of OR has a bid out this week that includes implementing a road usage charge as well as tolling and some other new things. This RUC is not just for EV's but all vehicles that don't pay there share of gas tax. I assume in the future we could add this to bike and whomever else is not paying there fair share of taxes. By the way, this also shows who is overpaying - like a large truck that only gets 10 mpg while towing... The study looked at how many miles you drove and made some assumptions about how much gas you use. But my vehicle gets about 19-20 mpg and the study always had me with a small credit. It also showed my out of state miles and how that would apply.

I bring this up because this is happening all over the country not just the NW. Lawmakers recognize that these new vehicles don't fit the gas tax model and they need their revenue to keep the infrastructure up to date. So, dig deeper into your pocket books...

Just to make another off topic point - the same thing happened when everyone wanted their house to be more efficient. People started installing insulation, energy efficient windows, etc. They utilities started losing money, so they raised the rates. All those companies that showed a home owner how they could pay back their upgrades by saving on energy bills, out the window because the rates went up and washed out all the savings...


....and above are several MORE reasons to avoid Or. and Wa.


Pretty much every state in the country, Canada, and Europe are going to this model - but ID, UT, CA, all looking at how to charge for mileage driven vs gas tax. Out East, same thing.

EV's are coming and they need to pay their fare share of the roadway. Now if they can just figure out how to get Bikes to pay back the Billions of infrastructure being installed to accommodate them...

BCSnob

Middletown, MD

Senior Member

Joined: 02/23/2002

View Profile



Posted: 02/04/22 12:03pm Link  |  Quote  |  Print  |  Notify Moderator

The loss in value of the collected gas tax (fed and state) due to inflation and improved vehicle mpg has been larger than the redirection of these monies to other uses.

A user fee is the most fair means to fund roads either by tolls or by mileage and then eliminate the gas tax. Tie the fees to inflation and write the laws so that the money only goes to fund roads. This last bit is key; politicians (on both sides) don’t like give up funds they are using for their pet projects.

* This post was last edited 02/04/22 12:37pm by BCSnob *   View edit history

time2roll

Southern California

Senior Member

Joined: 03/21/2005

View Profile



Good Sam RV Club Member


Posted: 02/04/22 12:40pm Link  |  Quote  |  Print  |  Notify Moderator

I believe the roads should be paid for with a progressive income tax structure.
Current fuel tax can go to projects to reduce pollution and alternate clean transportation infrastructure.


2001 F150 SuperCrew
2006 Keystone Springdale 249FWBHLS
675w Solar pictures back up

BCSnob

Middletown, MD

Senior Member

Joined: 02/23/2002

View Profile



Posted: 02/04/22 12:48pm Link  |  Quote  |  Print  |  Notify Moderator

I’d go the other way, roads are paid for by users; new transportation projects are paid for by other funding sources (like income or business tax).

Grit dog

Black Diamond, WA

Senior Member

Joined: 05/06/2013

View Profile


Offline
Posted: 02/04/22 03:07pm Link  |  Quote  |  Print  |  Notify Moderator

time2roll wrote:

I believe the roads should be paid for with a progressive income tax structure.
Current fuel tax can go to projects to reduce pollution and alternate clean transportation infrastructure.


Well dontcha know...If that ain't a classic Cali response I don't know what is....
So I should pay 3x as much road tax as the guy making a median income (tax the rich) for theoretically the same privilege's and 5x as much as anyone low income, who both hypothetically use the same roads the same amount.

Then I should get extra taxed for buying fossil fuel for my vehicle? Of course "I" would have the means to buy a EV, unlike the low and median income guy. So I escape that tax and the low and median guy pay by gas tax?

* This post was edited 02/06/22 03:06pm by an administrator/moderator *

larry cad

ohio

Senior Member

Joined: 05/23/2004

View Profile





Offline
Posted: 02/05/22 05:24am Link  |  Quote  |  Print  |  Notify Moderator

time2roll wrote:

Thermoguy wrote:

All those companies that showed a home owner how they could pay back their upgrades by saving on energy bills, out the window because the rates went up and washed out all the savings...
And for those that did not increase efficiency they still have both inefficient high usage AND the increased cost.



We're from the government, we're here to help you!


Today is my personal best for most consecutive days alive.

Our Travel Blog

JRscooby

Indepmo

Senior Member

Joined: 06/10/2019

View Profile


Offline
Posted: 02/05/22 06:11am Link  |  Quote  |  Print  |  Notify Moderator

larry cad wrote:

time2roll wrote:

Thermoguy wrote:

All those COMPANIES that showed a home owner how they could pay back their upgrades by saving on energy bills, out the window because the rates went up and washed out all the savings...
And for those that did not increase efficiency they still have both inefficient high usage AND the increased cost.



We're from the government, we're here to help you!


No wonder politics is so hard to discuss.

Reply to Topic  |  Subscribe  |  Print Page  |  Post New Topic  | 
Page of 17  
Prev  |  Next

Open Roads Forum  >  Tow Vehicles

 > Rivian Electric Truck takes on the Ike Gauntlet
Search:   Advanced Search

Search only in Tow Vehicles


New posts No new posts
Closed, new posts Closed, no new posts
Moved, new posts Moved, no new posts

Adjust text size:




© 2026 CWI, Inc. © 2026 Good Sam Enterprises, LLC. All Rights Reserved.