BCSnob

Middletown, MD

Senior Member

Joined: 02/23/2002

View Profile

|
Population-Based Estimates of Chronic Conditions Affecting Risk for Complications from Coronavirus Disease, United States
Emerging Infectious Diseases
Quote: We estimated that 45.4% of US adults are at increased risk for complications from coronavirus disease because of cardiovascular disease, diabetes, respiratory disease, hypertension, or cancer. Rates increased by age, from 19.8% for persons 18–29 years of age to 80.7% for persons >80 years of age, and varied by state, race/ethnicity, health insurance status, and employment.
This is from table 1 in this study where the authors have estimated the percentage of the population by age with at least one underlying health condition that increases the risk for severe Covid-19 infections.
Age, y % with at least 1 comorbidity
18–29 19.8
30–39 26.8
40–49 38.1
50–59 55.1
60–69 68.0
70–79 79.5
>80 80.7
|
MEXICOWANDERER

las peñas, michoacan, mexico

Senior Member

Joined: 06/01/2007

View Profile

Offline
|
Thank You
I wish statistics could be released that provides percentage lethality of the 70-79.5 age group without underlying risks of morbidity.
|
wilber1

Abbotsford B.C.

Senior Member

Joined: 12/16/2002

View Profile

|
MEXICOWANDERER wrote: Thank You
I wish statistics could be released that provides percentage lethality of the 70-79.5 age group without underlying risks of morbidity.
Old age increases the risk of morbidity.
"Never trust a man who has not a single redeeming vice" WSC
2011 RAM 3500 SRW
2015 Grand Design Reflection 303RLS
|
BCSnob

Middletown, MD

Senior Member

Joined: 02/23/2002

View Profile

|
This article examines literature to determine the average times for key events in the transmission of Covid-19.
Incubation period, time between infection to developing symptoms: average 5.7 days.
Index = the source person of an infection.
TOST (time from onset of symptoms in index to transmission to secondary): average -0.07 days. The distribution in the TOST ranges from -5days to +5days; this means the index case is infecting others up to 5 days before they even know they are sick.
The study estimates the infectiousness increases gradually from the time of infection to a maximum infectiousness of about at the onset of symptoms.
Based upon their analysis the authors have estimated that 42% of the transmissions from index to secondary occur before onset of symptoms, 20% occur on the day of symptom onset and 16% the next day, and only 22% form days 2 onward after the onset of symptoms. What does this say about the utility of temperature checks (checking for symptoms) as a means to prevent transmission?
There are good graphs in this article which describe the concepts and findings.
Quote: The timing of COVID-19 transmission
Abstract
The timing of SARS-CoV-2 transmission is a critical factor to understand the epidemic trajectory and the impact of isolation, contact tracing and other non- pharmaceutical interventions on the spread of COVID-19 epidemics. We examined the distribution of transmission events with respect to exposure and onset of symptoms. We show that for symptomatic individuals, the timing of transmission of SARS-CoV-2 is more strongly linked to the onset of clinical symptoms of COVID-19 than to the time since infection. We found that it was approximately centered and symmetric around the onset of symptoms, with three quarters of events occurring in the window from 2-3 days before to 2-3 days after. However, we caution against overinterpretation of the right tail of the distribution, due to its dependence on behavioural factors and interventions. We also found that the pre-symptomatic infectious period extended further back in time for individuals with longer incubation periods. This strongly suggests that information about when a case was infected should be collected where possible, in order to assess how far into the past their contacts should be traced. Overall, the fraction of transmission from strictly pre-symptomatic infections was high (41%; 95%CI 31-50%), which limits the efficacy of symptom-based interventions, and the large fraction of transmissions (35%; 95%CI 26-45%) that occur on the same day or the day after onset of symptoms underlines the critical importance of individuals distancing themselves from others as soon as they notice any symptoms, even if they are mild. Rapid or at-home testing and contextual risk information would greatly facilitate efficient early isolation.
* This post was
edited 09/08/20 07:48am by BCSnob *
|
BCSnob

Middletown, MD

Senior Member

Joined: 02/23/2002

View Profile

|
The Contagion Externality of a Superspreading Event:
The Sturgis Motorcycle Rally and COVID-19
IZA – Institute of Labor Economics
Quote: Large in-person gatherings without social distancing and with individuals who have traveled outside the local area are classified as the “highest risk” for COVID-19 spread by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Between August 7 and August 16, 2020, nearly 500,000 motorcycle enthusiasts converged on Sturgis, South Dakota for its annual motorcycle rally. Large crowds, coupled with minimal mask-wearing and social distancing by attendees, raised concerns that this event could serve as a COVID-19 “super-spreader.” This study is the first to explore the impact of this event on social distancing and the spread of COVID-19. First, using anonymized cell phone data from SafeGraph, Inc. we document that (i) smartphone pings from non-residents, and (ii) foot traffic at restaurants and bars, retail establishments, entertainment venues, hotels and campgrounds each rose substantially in the census block groups hosting Sturgis rally events. Stay-at-home behavior among local residents, as measured by median hours spent at home, fell. Second, using data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and a synthetic control approach, we show that by September 2, a month following the onset of the Rally, COVID-19 cases increased by approximately 6 to 7 cases per 1,000 population in its home county of Meade. Finally, difference-in-differences (dose response) estimates show that following the Sturgis event, counties that contributed the highest inflows of rally attendees experienced a 7.0 to 12.5 percent increase in COVID-19 cases relative to counties that did not contribute inflows. Descriptive evidence suggests these effects may be muted in states with stricter mitigation policies (i.e., restrictions on bar/restaurant openings, mask-wearing mandates). We conclude that the Sturgis Motorcycle Rally generated public health costs of approximately $12.2 billion.
The Department of Revenue’s Tax Collection for the 2020 Sturgis Motorcycle Rally Has Currently Exceeded $1.34 Million
Pierre, SD, USA / DRGNews
Sounds like SD made money while passing a bill onto the health department’s of other states (depending upon the increased health costs for SD residents due to the increased Covid-19 infections from the rally).
|
|
|
MEXICOWANDERER

las peñas, michoacan, mexico

Senior Member

Joined: 06/01/2007

View Profile

Offline
|
Thank you. I had a hunch that violating guidelines would come at a cost. Film showed primarily outside activities but ommited scenes indoors, bars, dining and partying.
AztraZeneca just halted stage III testing for it's vaccine trials in the US. Unexpected side effects. But the cure may or may not be as simple as reducing dosage potency? Perhaps a 2nd or 3rd booster? Newspaper information is long on impact and short on facts.
|
BCSnob

Middletown, MD

Senior Member

Joined: 02/23/2002

View Profile

|
This quote caught my attention.
Quote: AstraZeneca Covid-19 vaccine study put on hold due to suspected adverse reaction in participant in the U.K.
Stat News
Researchers running other trials are now looking for similar cases of adverse reactions by combing through databases reviewed by a so-called Data and Safety Monitoring Board, the second person said.
|
MEXICOWANDERER

las peñas, michoacan, mexico

Senior Member

Joined: 06/01/2007

View Profile

Offline
|
https://www.sfgate.com/news/article/Astr........-vaccine-study-paused-after-15551181.php
Is it standard protocol to hospitalize all adverse reactions in a phase III test? The fact that the study body was changed for all vaccines in phase 3 is curious.
|
BCSnob

Middletown, MD

Senior Member

Joined: 02/23/2002

View Profile

|
The sfgate linked article did not say the patent was hospitalized, it was another researcher’s opinion that person might have been hospitalized. We should stick with what is known not what might be happening. What we know is very little which makes this situation ripe for filling the void with speculation.
|
monkey44

Cape Cod, MA and Central Fla

Senior Member

Joined: 11/12/2002

View Profile

Offline
|
At first, it only means someone got sick from something, doesn't mean the test vaccine caused it. That answer comes later.
Monkey44
Cape Cod Ma & Central Fla
Chevy 2500HD 4x4 DC-SB
2008 Lance 845
Back-country camping fanatic
|
|
|