Coast Resorts Open Roads Forum: Travel Trailers: coachmen freedom express 192rbs
Open Roads Forum Already a member? Login here.   If not, Register Today!  |  Help

Newest  |  Active  |  Popular  |  RVing FAQ Forum Rules  |  Forum Posting Help and Support  |  Contact  

Search:   Advanced Search

Search only in Travel Trailers

Open Roads Forum  >  Travel Trailers  >  General Q&A

 > coachmen freedom express 192rbs

Reply to Topic  |  Subscribe  |  Print Page  |  Post New Topic  | 
Page of 11  
Prev  |  Next
Ralph Cramden

Not on this rag of a forum

Senior Member

Joined: 06/14/2017

View Profile



Posted: 12/02/17 03:17am Link  |  Quote  |  Print  |  Notify Moderator

mountainkowboy wrote:

WOW are the Lance units EXPENSIVE!!!! For us and what we will use it for there not worth the 20K more.



And despite the higher price tag, not immune to ISSUES the same as all of them.

I had a Lance owner look me right in the eye and tell me how his Lance was twice the trailer as my Rockwood at the campground. Three weeks later at the same campground he was at the fill station on Friday when I came in, laying under his Lance trying to find out why water was running out the bottom faster than it was going in.

* This post was edited 12/02/17 03:33am by Ralph Cramden *

SoundGuy

S Ontario

Senior Member

Joined: 02/11/2015

View Profile



Posted: 12/02/17 03:36am Link  |  Quote  |  Print  |  Notify Moderator

mountainkowboy wrote:

... and learned that we don't need a big RV since most of the time we're outdoors...camping.


The same lesson we learned years ago when long distance traveling with our boys in a 10' popup. [emoticon] To each his / her own but I'm still amazed by those who just can't "camp" without a 30'+ TT or 5th with multiple slides, then struggle to park it on a campsite [emoticon] ... makes no sense to me but I guess that's the difference between "camping" and "glamping". [emoticon] Unfortunately here in the east we don't have the opportunities as those in the west to camp in isolated areas but we do nonetheless enjoy relatively spacious campsites in our Ontario provincial park system where it's often still possible to camp and barely see your neighbour. In the US we've found state parks, COEs, etc to generally be less spacious but nonetheless still enjoy the experience when we're looking to get away camping and for that I'd agree - a 19' couple's trailer has everything we need in a relatively light weight, easy to tow trailer that can be parked on pretty well any campsite we may choose or be assigned. [emoticon] It's all a matter of perspective - we've just returned from Down Under where the vast majority of trailers, or "caravans", would be in the 19' to 23' range max, almost always with no slide(s), yet they're really modern and well equipped, often including a washer plus all the other usual amenities one could want or need. We've learned that "Go big or go home" really doesn't need to apply when it comes to selecting that "just right" couple's trailer. [emoticon]

SoundGuy

S Ontario

Senior Member

Joined: 02/11/2015

View Profile



Posted: 12/02/17 03:55am Link  |  Quote  |  Print  |  Notify Moderator

mountainkowboy wrote:

WOW are the Lance units EXPENSIVE!!!! For us and what we will use it for there not worth the 20K more.


Ralph Cramden wrote:

And despite the higher price tag, not immune to ISSUES the same as all of them.


Every trailer will have "issues", just some more than others, ultimately depending more on luck (or lack thereof) than anything else. [emoticon] Having been at this for a few years now I view this matter of "issues" more as the ability of the owner to deal with it rather than the issue itself. My own current trailer is no different than any other, with minor issues coming up once in awhile, but it's also presented me with a few serious issues - initially leaking, a blown tire, and now a cracked frame. On the forums I've noticed a definite "Chicken Little" reaction anytime this happens - it's the manufacturer's fault, the dealer doesn't know what he's doing, they're all out to "get me", woe is me, etc, ad nauseam. [emoticon] Seems to me the better approach is to simply realize the RV industry is what it is, they're mass producing a reasonably adequate product at the lowest cost possible, and simply throwing a lot more $$$$ at it isn't any guarantee at all that it will be any better. Believe it, Airstream and Lance owners have "issues" too. [emoticon]

jjjandrbaker

San Antonio, TX

Senior Member

Joined: 03/12/2012

View Profile





Offline
Posted: 12/02/17 08:08am Link  |  Quote  |  Print  |  Notify Moderator

mountainkowboy wrote:

...learned that we don't need a big RV since most of the time we're outdoors...camping.


My last camper was a 13 footer. I had it for 5 years and really enjoyed it. It was about as cramped and tiny as you can get without going to a tear drop. Now, with the 192RBS, I am sometimes overwhelmed by how spacious it is. I honestly don't think I will ever upgrade for the sole purpose of going bigger. That being said, I know two couples who do. One couple is on their third trailer in 5 years. The other is on their second. All to be bigger. They started with 25 footers. It is all a matter of personal preference.


Jim Baker
San Antonio, TX
travel blog and photos


mountainkowboy

Socal/NE Oregon

Senior Member

Joined: 09/20/2004

View Profile



Good Sam RV Club Member

Offline
Posted: 12/02/17 11:43am Link  |  Quote  |  Print  |  Notify Moderator

SoundGuy wrote:


The same lesson we learned years ago when long distance traveling with our boys in a 10' popup. [emoticon] To each his / her own but I'm still amazed by those who just can't "camp" without a 30'+ TT or 5th with multiple slides, then struggle to park it on a campsite [emoticon] ... makes no sense to me but I guess that's the difference between "camping" and "glamping".


We enjoyed our Moho and put 33,000 miles on it in the 3 years we owned it. We noticed that it was mostly empty and the 7mpg sucked, maybe if we were full-timing it would have had more stuff in it. It was nice in bad weather and wasn't a problem at any campground and was pretty easy to drive.

[image]


Chuck & Ruth with 4-legged Molly
2007 Tiffin Allegro 30DA
2011 Ford Ranger
1987 HD FLHTP


Last Train

Texas

Full Member

Joined: 04/21/2016

View Profile



Good Sam RV Club Member

Offline
Posted: 12/02/17 01:45pm Link  |  Quote  |  Print  |  Notify Moderator

SoundGuy wrote:

We purchased a new 2014 Coachmen Freedom Express 192RBS in July 2013 and have used it extensively since then. This generation had a short queen bed but I improved that significantly by extending the bed platform. The inexpensive stock mattress was rock hard but adding a 3" gel memory foam topper turned it into a soft pillow top. Mine doesn't have a vent over the main cabin so I instead use a window mounted fan, current models do have a vent in which you could mount a powered vent fan. In later model years (2016 ?) Coachmen changed the profile of the front wall so although the trailer is still 22' 6" coupler to bumper the bed is now an 80" full length queen bed. [emoticon]

The bathroom is about as small as it could be and although I'd prefer a bit more space it serves the purpose just fine. I did invent a shower curtain shaper so the shower curtain won't stick to us when showering. The toilet is angled so there's plenty of clearance between it and the bathroom door when sitting on the throne.

I love the massive front pass through storage compartment where I have plenty of space for our needs - even carry my spare tire in there rather than under the A frame.

Current models have a useless ommi directional OTA antenna, mine came with a Winegard Sensar III which I upgraded to a Sensar IV, adding a Winegard SignalPro as well so performance is about as good as it gets in an RV antenna. The current antenna I'd probably replace, but with what I'm not sure.

A trailer this size isn't going to have both a dinette and sofa but our reasoning is we'd be better served with a sofa as we often eat outdoors anyway. The trailer does come with a stand alone table but it's awfully big so we instead use a couple of lightweight TV tables anytime we may want to eat inside. Unlike many trailers this one offers a reasonable amount of kitchen counter work space which can be further improved by placing a cutting board atop the stove. Interior cabinet space is generous and we've never been able to use it all, though I did add a third door to the cabinet next to the entry door.

At 22' 6" this trailer is not only easy to tow but can be parked on pretty well any campsite, an important factor for us as we often go camping last minute, without a reservation, which during the busy summer months means we often don't have much choice in which site we get. With a trailer this size I know we'll always fit and I must admit I do enjoy watching those with 30 footers trying to squeeze on to their campsite. [emoticon]

CCC is far more generous than with many similar models from other manufacturers, in excess of 2000 lbs. I typically run ~ 4800 lbs loaded & ready to camp with an average gross tongue weight of ~ 625 lbs. I do use a trunnion bar Reese WD system but no sway control.

This trailer comes stock with off shore Chinese tires (Trail Express in my case) and not surprisingly one them failed earlier this summer - simply split, exposing the steel belt inside. Further inspection showed a large, oval shaped bubble where the interior ply had separated from the rest. I replaced all four with the new US made Goodyear Endurance and expect I won't have any further tire issues. I understand Jayco is now fitting Endurance tires to many of it's new models so if I were buying another Freedom Express I'd want to consider this as well.

Mine has an open underbelly, which I prefer, but I believe current models have an enclosed underbelly. That may be a drawback as it would be difficult to ascertain whether new models suffer the same issue as mine did - a sagging fresh water tank. I solved that on my own trailer but I'd bet there are plenty of these trailers running around with the owner not realizing just how poorly these tanks are installed. As far as I know Coachmen has done little to improve this situation so it's one I'd look at carefully myself should I ever want to buy another Freedom Express.

The only major failure I've had is the frame cracking on both sides, just aft of the rear tires. Turns out this is a pressed together Lippert frame and although Coachmen was forced to issue a recall for some models to install missing frame stiffeners my particular unit isn't on the list and therefore isn't covered for repair. My dealer is nonetheless going to repair this damage anyway but I'd caution anyone buying a used model to be aware of this issue. Newer models have a different frame and shouldn't have this issue.

Coachmen has really stepped up the game by improving the look of the Freedom Express series with a profiled front wall. Personally I don't care for some of the current interior colours and the exterior white trim but others of course may disagree.

Overall this trailer serves our needs really well, tows well behind our Silverado, and I have no plans to replace it. Forum member Last Train tows his own 192RBS with a Honda Pilot but I personally wouldn't want to tow any trailer this size with anything less than a 1/2 ton truck. JMO.

Anytime we camp with others they have their own camper so accommodating other couples isn't an issue for us. For those for whom this is an issue I'd instead suggest the somewhat larger Coachmen Freedom Express 231RBDS which has an especially large dinette that can be converted to a full size queen bed for night time use by a visiting couple.

Further details are illustrated in my gallery. [emoticon]


Our 2016 192 RBS has been one of the best “investments” we’ve ever made in our lifestyle. I’ll generally support what SoundGuy has said with one major exception. Our tow vehicle is a 2011 Honda Ridgeline - not a Pilot. I mention that partly because the Ridgeline, though a midsize pickup, it actually behaves more similarly to a 1/2 ton. The Ridgeline was built to be a very flexible and capable sport utility truck. It only shares about 30% of its parts with the Pilot. The Ridgeline has a much stiffer ladder frame and suspension components more robust than the Pilot. Lots of other differences, but the key point is that we feel very satisfied with the matchup of our trailer and the Ridgeline. It is very stable and solid as can be when towing this rig. No offense to any Pilot owners, but I don’t think I would be as comfortable towing this size rig with a Pilot, since its DNA is SUV - not truck.

* This post was edited 12/03/17 08:22pm by Last Train *


2016 Coachmen Freedom Express 192RBS
2018 RAM 1500 Ecodiesel

SoundGuy

S Ontario

Senior Member

Joined: 02/11/2015

View Profile



Posted: 12/02/17 02:30pm Link  |  Quote  |  Print  |  Notify Moderator

Last Train wrote:

I’ll generally support what SoundGuy has said with one major exception. Our tow vehicle is a 2011 Honda Ridgeline - not a Pilot.


Memory lapse - Ridgeline, not Pilot. [emoticon] My point though was I personally wouldn't feel comfortable towing this size of trailer with anything less than a V8 1/2 ton, which the Ridgeline isn't ... I'll correct my post though so as to not be imprecise. [emoticon]

babock

Los Angeles, CA

Senior Member

Joined: 12/18/2007

View Profile


Offline
Posted: 12/02/17 04:17pm Link  |  Quote  |  Print  |  Notify Moderator

SoundGuy wrote:

Last Train wrote:

I’ll generally support what SoundGuy has said with one major exception. Our tow vehicle is a 2011 Honda Ridgeline - not a Pilot.


Memory lapse - Ridgeline, not Pilot. [emoticon] My point though was I personally wouldn't feel comfortable towing this size of trailer with anything less than a V8 1/2 ton, which the Ridgeline isn't ... I'll correct my post though so as to not be imprecise. [emoticon]
I agree...wheel base is WAY to short. I have towed with short wheel base vehicles like that in the past and it was not fun going down mountains in California.

The wheelbase of the ridgeline is 125". Wheel base of my Silverado is 143".

mountainkowboy

Socal/NE Oregon

Senior Member

Joined: 09/20/2004

View Profile



Good Sam RV Club Member

Offline
Posted: 12/02/17 05:16pm Link  |  Quote  |  Print  |  Notify Moderator

babock wrote:

SoundGuy wrote:

Last Train wrote:

I’ll generally support what SoundGuy has said with one major exception. Our tow vehicle is a 2011 Honda Ridgeline - not a Pilot.


Memory lapse - Ridgeline, not Pilot. [emoticon] My point though was I personally wouldn't feel comfortable towing this size of trailer with anything less than a V8 1/2 ton, which the Ridgeline isn't ... I'll correct my post though so as to not be imprecise. [emoticon]
I agree...wheel base is WAY to short. I have towed with short wheel base vehicles like that in the past and it was not fun going down mountains in California.

The wheelbase of the ridgeline is 125". Wheel base of my Silverado is 143".


The 192 was designed to be towed by SUV's and mid-size trucks. People that own them report camping weights around 4,600lbs or so, which is well within the abilities for these class vehicles. They do not require a 1/2 ton truck that's rated to tow twice that weight. It's no different than an F350 towing a 38' 16K trailer behind it. If your not comfortable towing close to your vehicles ratings that's fine...but quite making it sound like it isn't safe to use the trailer as it is designed.

SoundGuy

S Ontario

Senior Member

Joined: 02/11/2015

View Profile



Posted: 12/02/17 09:34pm Link  |  Quote  |  Print  |  Notify Moderator

Last Train wrote:

I’ll generally support what SoundGuy has said with one major exception. Our tow vehicle is a 2011 Honda Ridgeline - not a Pilot.


SoundGuy wrote:

Memory lapse - Ridgeline, not Pilot. [emoticon] My point though was I personally wouldn't feel comfortable towing this size of trailer with anything less than a V8 1/2 ton, which the Ridgeline isn't ... I'll correct my post though so as to not be imprecise. [emoticon]


babock wrote:

I agree...wheel base is WAY to short. I have towed with short wheel base vehicles like that in the past and it was not fun going down mountains in California.

The wheelbase of the ridgeline is 125". Wheel base of my Silverado is 143".


mountainkowboy wrote:

The 192 was designed to be towed by SUV's and mid-size trucks. People that own them report camping weights around 4,600lbs or so, which is well within the abilities for these class vehicles. They do not require a 1/2 ton truck that's rated to tow twice that weight. It's no different than an F350 towing a 38' 16K trailer behind it. If your not comfortable towing close to your vehicles ratings that's fine...but quite making it sound like it isn't safe to use the trailer as it is designed.


You might want to make it clear as to exactly whom you're addressing your comments as I've never claimed that towing a 192RBS with anything less than a 1/2 was "unsafe", just that I personally would be uncomfortable with it. In fact, even babock never said it wasn't "safe", just that he found towing a trailer of this size down a mountainside with a relatively short wheelbase vehicle "was not fun". Everyone is entitled to their opinion, some just happen to disagree with yours. That should be "fine" too. [emoticon]

Reply to Topic  |  Subscribe  |  Print Page  |  Post New Topic  | 
Page of 11  
Prev  |  Next

Open Roads Forum  >  Travel Trailers  >  General Q&A

 > coachmen freedom express 192rbs
Search:   Advanced Search

Search only in Travel Trailers


New posts No new posts
Closed, new posts Closed, no new posts
Moved, new posts Moved, no new posts

Adjust text size:




© 2026 CWI, Inc. © 2026 Good Sam Enterprises, LLC. All Rights Reserved.