Open Roads Forum |
Print | Close |
Topic: Nascar Follies |
Posted By: PawPaw_n_Gram
on 04/25/18 10:54am
|
Looks like a buy in ride for Kenseth. I can’t tell if Matt is bringing Wyndham Rewards to Fenway/Roush or if Wyndham wanted a biggger name than Bayne to drive the car on weekends when they are the primary sponsor.
Full-Time 2014 - ???? “Not all who wander are lost.” "You were supposed to turn back at the last street." 2012 Ram 2500 Mega Cab 2014 Flagstaff 832IKBS TT ![]() |
Posted By: bucky
on 04/26/18 05:31am
|
I'm happy for Matt, always a class guy.
Puma 30RKSS ![]() |
Posted By: FlatBroke
on 04/26/18 08:50am
|
Matt back in a Ford. I can start rooting for him again!
Hitch Hiker "08" 29.5 FKTG LS ![]() |
Posted By: PawPaw_n_Gram
on 04/26/18 01:22pm
|
Is Captain Roger going to warn Joey to avoid getting close to the 6?
|
Posted By: TxGearhead
on 04/28/18 08:01pm
|
I'm thinking Bayne and Stenhouse aren't giving the right feedback to their crew chief's. Both could likely drive a decent car to better results if it was set up right. Maybe "what we have here is a failure to communicate". 2018 Ram 3500 CC LB DRW 4X4 Cummins Aisin Laramie Pearl White 2018 Landmark Oshkosh 2008 Bigfoot 25C9.4 2014 NauticStar 21 ShallowBay 150HP Yamaha 2016 GoDevil 18X44 35HP Surface Drive |
Posted By: bucky
on 04/29/18 04:53am
|
Nascar strikes again with late changes. Due to the huge tumble and roll in practice the plate has been changed to a slightly smaller one. In my opinion this will just bunch the field up even more leading to even more parade laps. Coupled with the aero problems this year it could turn into a demolition derby if anybody entertains the thought of passing somebody. He got punted at 200 MPH while sideways, a smaller plate would not have changed much of what happened. |
Posted By: Zman300
on 04/29/18 10:08am
|
Watched some of qualifying yesterday. They were talking about Harvick and Busch. How their cars were skewed to the left. Don't follow NASCAR that much, what were they talking about. Thanks No RV at the moment. Looking to hit the road in a year or two. ![]() |
Posted By: PawPaw_n_Gram
on 04/29/18 12:28pm
|
Race cars seldom have the axles completely parallel or the rear tires following in the track of the front tires. Offsetting the axles so that the distance between the inside tires is shorter than the distance between the outside tires, even a half inch or an inch, helps the car turn. The same with offsetting the rear axle. If you measure a race track , you will find about 60-70% of the distance is in the turns. For a 500 mile race that can be 300-350 miles in curves and 200-150 miles on the straight. You might say those adjustments are rough on tire wear. Certainly they are. But those teams never plan to run even 100 miles on an $7-8,000 set of tires. The Stewart Haas cars are certainly legal. Most of the other cars are offset the same way, but not to the maximum allow d like the #4 and #41. Some of that adjustment is driver preference. |
Posted By: Zman300
on 04/29/18 01:14pm
|
Learned something new. Thanks How much is allowed. On a road course, do they run parallel. |
Posted By: PawPaw_n_Gram
on 04/29/18 01:51pm
|
It is difficult to know the exact allowances. The NASCAR rule book is only available to registered car owners, is a few thousand pages, and costs over $1,000. And allowances for different for different tracks. I would assume the offsets are minimal on road courses, but as I mentioned - driver preference has a lot to do with settings. Two drivers with identical cars with identical setups will usually perform differently. And as we’ve seen in the first stage of the race - the aggressive setups that helped Harvick and Kurt get on the front row in qualifying are apparently a dis advantage in race traffic. |
Print | Close |