wnjj
Cornelius, Oregon
Senior Member
Joined: 01/11/2007
View Profile
 Offline
|
MTBob wrote:My 4600's have a small plastic handle just under the gear box that moves a nylon gizmo (technical term) and disengages the gear box drive from the ball screw. I don't know if that is a "quick" release, but it does disengage the gear drive from the jack leg. Are you talking about a second release lever that is called a "quick release"?
I haven't tried pushing the leg down with the lever in the released position. If the leg does go down easily, I'll be fairly concerned about an inadvertent release. I'll give that a try tomorrow and see what happens.
If you have 4600's then yes, you can push down on them and they will go down. There is no second lever. The one-way brake and ball-screw design allows for free wheeling down but not the other way. The brake plus re-engaging the lever once you are nearly down makes sure the camper cannot fall. Always run the jacks down a bit more so the square drive re-engages after you drop them. I find this feature VERY nice for putting the jacks down quickly and fairly quietly.
Depending on the lube condition you either can just barely push down or you may have to stand/jump on them. They aren't going to fall down if you leave the lever up, especially if the last thing you did is power them up with the motors. It no more likely than leaving your truck in neutral and having it roll away.
|
MTBob
Montana
Senior Member
Joined: 07/17/2008
View Profile
Offline
|
wnjj wrote:jjinatx wrote:My 2002 4100's have only 1 lever for the motor release lever but it doesn't function as a "quick release".
The difference between the4500/4600 and the 4100 is a lot, though they look the same externally. 4500/4600 is rated for 1900# of lift and the 4100 for 1500#. Internally they are different as well (I'll post pics later). The specs for the 4150 are the same as the 4100, so I assume it's the replacement like the 4600 for the 4500? The 4100/4150 is about $100 cheaper than the 4500/4600.
You could replace a 4100 with a 4500/4600, but NOT the other way around, so if you want a single spare, get a 4500/4600.
-jj
Ok, I see. Just having a lever doesn't mean quick release. The quick release allows you step on the jack foot and push it to the ground. The 4600 has that but the 4500 doesn't. Both are recirculating ball instead of acme screw design of the 4100/4150's, hence the higher weight rating.
My 4600's have a small plastic handle just under the gear box that moves a nylon gizmo (technical term) and disengages the gear box drive from the ball screw. I don't know if that is a "quick" release, but it does disengage the gear drive from the jack leg. Are you talking about a second release lever that is called a "quick release"?
I haven't tried pushing the leg down with the lever in the released position. If the leg does go down easily, I'll be fairly concerned about an inadvertent release. I'll give that a try tomorrow and see what happens.
Bob
2002 10-2000RR Northern Lite
2008 Chevy 3500 DMAX, SRW,
2001 Lund 1700 Fisherman
|
wnjj
Cornelius, Oregon
Senior Member
Joined: 01/11/2007
View Profile
Offline
|
jjinatx wrote:My 2002 4100's have only 1 lever for the motor release lever but it doesn't function as a "quick release".
The difference between the4500/4600 and the 4100 is a lot, though they look the same externally. 4500/4600 is rated for 1900# of lift and the 4100 for 1500#. Internally they are different as well (I'll post pics later). The specs for the 4150 are the same as the 4100, so I assume it's the replacement like the 4600 for the 4500? The 4100/4150 is about $100 cheaper than the 4500/4600.
You could replace a 4100 with a 4500/4600, but NOT the other way around, so if you want a single spare, get a 4500/4600.
-jj
Ok, I see. Just having a lever doesn't mean quick release. The quick release allows you step on the jack foot and push it to the ground. The 4600 has that but the 4500 doesn't. Both are recirculating ball instead of acme screw design of the 4100/4150's, hence the higher weight rating.
|
bigfootford
Fair Oaks, California
Senior Member
Joined: 12/03/2002
View Profile
Good Sam RV Club Member
|
MTBob wrote:
IMHO, I am not a fan of WD40 for other than applying to unimportant places, i.e. lawn mower wheel axles... or, better yet, for coating bass lures (great for catching fish!). I carry a couple cans in the boat all the time. I wouldn't use it on a HJ, the stuff has a tendency to gum up after a while and, frankly, I don't think it has all that good lubrication properties. If you want to use a light weight oil, I'd recommend something like TriFlow or Lubriplate spray oils. WD40 does work great as a lubricant when machining aluminum.
Your right, and I am not using it as a lube!!! I am using it as a solvent. It is an excellent at disolving oils and grease. Cleaning it off after, then applying the grease.
Jim
2000 2500 9.6 Bigfoot,94 F250, Vision 19.5, Mich 245/70XDS2's, Bilstein shocks, air bags/pump, EU2000, PD 9260,Lifeline 100ah, 200W. solar, Morningstar Sunsaver 15A/ display panel, Trimetric, Delorme/laptop, Holux gps rec,led lights, Wave-3 heat.
|
jjinatx
Austin, TX, USA
Senior Member
Joined: 11/25/2003
View Profile
Good Sam RV Club Member
Offline
|
wnjj wrote:MTBob wrote:My 2002 4100's have a quick release lever.
That's good to know.
Super_Dave & I have the same brand & year of camper ('07) and I think 4600's were the only available quick release models then. I wonder what the difference is between a 4100 & 4600? Upgraded capacity maybe? They don't make the 4100 any more.
My 2002 4100's have only 1 lever for the motor release lever but it doesn't function as a "quick release".
The difference between the4500/4600 and the 4100 is a lot, though they look the same externally. 4500/4600 is rated for 1900# of lift and the 4100 for 1500#. Internally they are different as well (I'll post pics later). The specs for the 4150 are the same as the 4100, so I assume it's the replacement like the 4600 for the 4500? The 4100/4150 is about $100 cheaper than the 4500/4600.
You could replace a 4100 with a 4500/4600, but NOT the other way around, so if you want a single spare, get a 4500/4600.
-jj
Current Rig: 2017 F350 Crew Cab Short Bed 4X4 Powerstroke, 2018 Grand Design Reflection 29RS. Dearly Departed: 2003 GMC Sierra 3500 Dually, 2002 Bigfoot 25C10.6.
|
|
|
wnjj
Cornelius, Oregon
Senior Member
Joined: 01/11/2007
View Profile
Offline
|
MTBob wrote:My 2002 4100's have a quick release lever.
That's good to know.
Super_Dave & I have the same brand & year of camper ('07) and I think 4600's were the only available quick release models then. I wonder what the difference is between a 4100 & 4600? Upgraded capacity maybe? They don't make the 4100 any more.
|
MTBob
Montana
Senior Member
Joined: 07/17/2008
View Profile
Offline
|
jjinatx wrote:Update on my jack saga. It turns out my rear jacks are 4100 models, not 4500 models like the fronts. The 4100 is quite a bit different internally and I'll post some pics soon of the insides of them to add to this great thread. I also see evidence of lubrication on the 4100's and in fact did not seem like they needed re-lubing at all.
Bad news. The 4500 that had been given me problems and had frozen up appears to need replacing. Even after I re-lubed it and can turn it with my fingers on the bench, when it under load coming down it binds up occasionally. When it does, I have to unload some of the weight by lifting a bit on the opposite side. My best guess is that the mechanism that is preened into the top of the lower leg that the acme screw threads through is worn and binding under load. But before I order a new one, I'll take it apart once more for closer inspection and maybe replace the thrust bearing in case that is the problem.
I have a bit of a dilemma when it comes to replacing it. I can get one 4500 for about $350, or a pair of 4600 jacks for about $550 (the place only sells them in pairs). Is the 4600 worth upgrading to from the 4500? Is the only difference between them the quick released? Or is the mechanism stronger/better? Do I want to spend $200 extra now to save $150 just in case the other one goes out too?
If I do have to replace the jack, I'll cut it open and post some pics of the innards of the lower leg to this thread.-jj
If I could find a "deal" on 4100 and 4500 model jacks I'd buy one each and rebuild them as spares. Then rotate them when a jack on the camper acted up.
|
MTBob
Montana
Senior Member
Joined: 07/17/2008
View Profile
Offline
|
jjinatx wrote:
I'm also questioning the accuracy of setting them by the torque on the nut. It's a lock nut, so the torque will be greatly affected by the drag of the plastic locking material, not just how tight the nut is against the spring plate. The drag of the plastic would be pretty specific to who made the nut, or even across lots, I would guess. Not sure what kind of SAE standards there are for lock nuts, and how tightly controlled they can be. It would seem that a nut that has been re-used would probably have less drag than a brand new one. A better solution for repeatable torque settings would be to torque a plain nut and then use a jamb nut to secure it.-jj
You know, I think you are right. Something that I hadn't given much thought to - the friction differences that may arise between a new, relatively new, or very used plastic shake proof locking nut. This issue may be more pronounced with the small amount of torque applied to these relatively small nuts. The HJ tech guy said that 9-10 inch-pounds is what they use. So, I'd guess that means that with a new plastic lock nut... maybe. But, that still could lead to considerable differences in torque depending on the accuracy of the location and sizing of the plastic in the nut itself. And, making this even more curious is the apparent difference you used on your torque (30 -35 i-p) compared to what I used. I wouldn't think that difference would be attributed to simply the plastic design difference. From a repeatable design view, I think you are correct that two plain jamb nuts set with a torque wrench would be a better option. But... what is the correct torque then?
Now you've got really scratching my head on this clutch design. I'm going to go back and check the number of balls on my 4500 clutch - hopefully I took pictures of a 4500 . I'm not sure I did photograph them since they all looked the same.
Can you confirm how many balls your 4100 clutch has?
|
jjinatx
Austin, TX, USA
Senior Member
Joined: 11/25/2003
View Profile
Good Sam RV Club Member
Offline
|
MTBob wrote:
To confirm, your 4100 model had a six ball clutch? If so, you've now got me wondering if there is a difference in the 4100 model, depending on the year it was made.
Regarding the clutch nut torque: 30 - 35 inch-pounds is quite a bit different than what I used (9-10 inch-pounds). This seems odd since I would think that a six ball clutch would have more resistance than the 3 ball design that I have. In any case, I would rather error on the side of having the clutch set too loose than too tight. If the clutch is over tightened there is a risk of stripping gears or overloading the motor - (I'd guess that's what would happen).
It would sure be nice if HJ company provided some guidance as to parts lists, and full maintenance of these jacks.
No, the motor clutch I took apart is on a 4500 - not a 4100. I bet they use the same motor though, because HJ only sells one replacement motor. My camper is 2002 vintage I believe and these are the original jacks. I suspect there was a design change somewhere along the line, so if yours are newer, maybe they evolved from 6 to 3 balls or vice versa. Or maybe it's an issue of multiple suppliers. Also, the balls in my clutch look to be a LOT smaller than yours, so shallower depressions. Not sure how that would affect the torque settings.
I'm wondering if it would be OK to try overloading each motor individually to test the clutch in each one. If the motor stalls, then the clutch torque settings need to be backed off. I've never heard any of mine click before I had this frozen jack, but then I'm pretty careful about not retracting them so hard that the motor stalls or the clutch clicks. I usually stop them individually when I think they are all the way up and if I guess wrong and hear the motor bog, I stop immediately and back it off a bit.
I'm also questioning the accuracy of setting them by the torque on the nut. It's a lock nut, so the torque will be greatly affected by the drag of the plastic locking material, not just how tight the nut is against the spring plate. The drag of the plastic would be pretty specific to who made the nut, or even across lots, I would guess. Not sure what kind of SAE standards there are for lock nuts, and how tightly controlled they can be. It would seem that a nut that has been re-used would probably have less drag than a brand new one. A better solution for repeatable torque settings would be to torque a plain nut and then use a jamb nut to secure it.
I'm going to try one last ditch effort at saving my jack by trying to get a replacement thrust bearing at my local bearing supply house tomorrow. If I can't get a replacement, I'll try swapping a bearing from a good jack to the problem jack and see if the problem goes away.
-jj
|
MTBob
Montana
Senior Member
Joined: 07/17/2008
View Profile
Offline
|
jjinatx wrote:MTBob,
I took apart the clutch in the motor that was popping and could see that it had indeed been recently slipping. Mine is a bit different than yours. It has 6 ball bearings that are smaller than yours. Also, I tested the torque on the clutch nut of a different motor and it looked to be about 30 - 35 inch-pounds, so that's what I set the one I took apart to.-jj
To confirm, your 4100 model had a six ball clutch? If so, you've now got me wondering if there is a difference in the 4100 model, depending on the year it was made.
Regarding the clutch nut torque: 30 - 35 inch-pounds is quite a bit different than what I used (9-10 inch-pounds). This seems odd since I would think that a six ball clutch would have more resistance than the 3 ball design that I have. In any case, I would rather error on the side of having the clutch set too loose than too tight. If the clutch is over tightened there is a risk of stripping gears or overloading the motor - (I'd guess that's what would happen).
It would sure be nice if HJ company provided some guidance as to parts lists, and full maintenance of these jacks.
|
|
|
|
