Coast Resorts Open Roads Forum: Tow Vehicles: Diesel vs gas......................
Open Roads Forum Already a member? Login here.   If not, Register Today!  |  Help

Newest  |  Active  |  Popular  |  RVing FAQ Forum Rules  |  Forum Posting Help and Support  |  Contact  

Search:   Advanced Search

Search only in Tow Vehicles

Open Roads Forum  >  Tow Vehicles

 > Diesel vs gas......................

Reply to Topic  |  Subscribe  |  Print Page  |  Post New Topic  | 
Page of 469  
Prev  |  Next
sacmarata

BLUE GRASS HEAVEN

Full Member

Joined: 05/12/2014

View Profile


Offline
Posted: 06/05/14 09:30am Link  |  Quote  |  Print  |  Notify Moderator

Sport45 wrote:

Steakman wrote:


My point my "friend" is this. The more mandated Emissions BS that is added to diesel trucks the lower the mpgs - plainly obvious. As a result you need more fuel to go the same distance.
stk


I hear ya. But you have to understand that's the same argument we (me included) had against emission systems on our gas engines in the 70's. Lost power, used more gas, but you can't argue our air is cleaner as a result. And a gas engine today makes more power from less displacement and gets better mpg to boot. I, for one, don't wish to relive the "good old days".

If the engineers are forced to make the same leaps with diesel technology we will all benefit in the long run. In the mean time, more fuel doesn't equal more emissions. In this case it only means cleaner air.


My 1981 VW Rabbit diesel got 52+/- mpg before all the hippies got ahold of our government. Ive lived in the Ohio Valley Region (Ozone Alley)all my life and don't recall all the smog every talks about from back in the days of those horrible 52mpg diesels, and somehow doubt that the average commuter vehicle, whether it be a VW Rabbit or those beastly 12v Dodge Cummins were responsible for more than a fraction of a percent of the smog that actually was there.

OhhWell

Florida

Senior Member

Joined: 06/27/2011

View Profile



Good Sam RV Club Member

Offline
Posted: 06/05/14 10:18am Link  |  Quote  |  Print  |  Notify Moderator

sacmarata wrote:

Sport45 wrote:

Steakman wrote:


My point my "friend" is this. The more mandated Emissions BS that is added to diesel trucks the lower the mpgs - plainly obvious. As a result you need more fuel to go the same distance.
stk


I hear ya. But you have to understand that's the same argument we (me included) had against emission systems on our gas engines in the 70's. Lost power, used more gas, but you can't argue our air is cleaner as a result. And a gas engine today makes more power from less displacement and gets better mpg to boot. I, for one, don't wish to relive the "good old days".

If the engineers are forced to make the same leaps with diesel technology we will all benefit in the long run. In the mean time, more fuel doesn't equal more emissions. In this case it only means cleaner air.


My 1981 VW Rabbit diesel got 52+/- mpg before all the hippies got ahold of our government. Ive lived in the Ohio Valley Region (Ozone Alley)all my life and don't recall all the smog every talks about from back in the days of those horrible 52mpg diesels, and somehow doubt that the average commuter vehicle, whether it be a VW Rabbit or those beastly 12v Dodge Cummins were responsible for more than a fraction of a percent of the smog that actually was there.


your '81 rabbit diesel only weighed about 1800 lbs and put 75 hp which was considered fine back then but would be laughed at today. These days, cars need to have more luxury features (weight), interior room (weight) and power to sell.

Anyway, I wish it was JUST the "hippies" that got ahold of the government.


1998 bounder 36s V10 F53

sacmarata

BLUE GRASS HEAVEN

Full Member

Joined: 05/12/2014

View Profile


Offline
Posted: 06/05/14 11:07am Link  |  Quote  |  Print  |  Notify Moderator

OhhWell wrote:

your '81 rabbit diesel only weighed about 1800 lbs and put 75 hp which was considered fine back then but would be laughed at today. These days, cars need to have more luxury features (weight), interior room (weight) and power to sell.

Anyway, I wish it was JUST the "hippies" that got ahold of the government.


I can proimise you, it was still laughed at even back in the day...LOL.
I can't say I was happy with the power, but the mpg made up for it.

And to your last statement; thats something we can definitely agree on. [emoticon]

carl2591

Garner NC

Senior Member

Joined: 11/22/2012

View Profile



Good Sam RV Club Member

Offline
Posted: 06/27/14 11:50am Link  |  Quote  |  Print  |  Notify Moderator

parkersdad wrote:

I only use the stuff in the auto parts store. It comes with a long hose and the 2 1/2 gallons you get will give me about three quarters of a tank.


I think i saw some in a grocery store.. convenience store as well have it on the shelf at some places. cost is most likely less at pepboys, advance auto type places.. a lot of filling stations especially ones with diesel have it on the shelve as well.


Carl2591, Raleigh NC
2005 Airstream Classic 31D
2003 Ford F-250 SD, CC, 7.3L modded diesel machine
Every day is a new day with potential to be life changing.

carl2591

Garner NC

Senior Member

Joined: 11/22/2012

View Profile



Good Sam RV Club Member

Offline
Posted: 06/27/14 12:09pm Link  |  Quote  |  Print  |  Notify Moderator

so now back to they main attraction ,,, Diesel vs gas.

I have been going over the same issues for the past several months my self in trying to determine which is better in the long run. While it true the gas are lower cost up front when buying new you loose more value with them quicker with miles from towing.

A diesel on the other hand is higher cost up front but a diesel with 150K vs a gasser with 150 will garner more dollars as used trucks on resale market.

THis is why i am looking at 2002 ford f-250 SD PSD 7.3L XLT supercab 2 wd version with 152K miles for my future towing duties. this unit already has a elec trailer brake box and mounts for 5th wheel in bad along with air bags so i know it done some towing. In checking the carfax it appers the truck was taken care of for the most part..

It runs good, does not show any smoke at start up, when you open the oil filler cap there is no pressure. for the most part if OEM stock.

The stealersship is asking $13995 and nada is listing it at $11,925..
I plan to take it to a local diesel performance shop close by to check out and they take oil, trans, rearend, and antifreeze samples to send off for analyst for $125..

My point is I feel from reading all the posts in this thread, or almost all of them, the diesel is better suited for full-time use in pull a TT, especially out west, which is where we plan to go in some 5 yrs when we start to full-time..

in the mean time this will be an occasional driver with us getting a TT in 2-3 yrs for weekend, short week etc use.

I am not able to afford a new or almost new truck at some 28-35K. The difference between a 2002 and 2012 will buy a lot of diesel no matter what the price.

It was a tough and hard thought out process that lead to this point..

I do appreciate all the comments both for and against each type.. that is what make a forum like this so fun and interesting.

thanks a million and keep the comments coming..

Sport45

Not far enough from Houston, TX

Senior Member

Joined: 09/24/2001

View Profile


Offline
Posted: 06/27/14 11:10pm Link  |  Quote  |  Print  |  Notify Moderator

carl2591 wrote:

so now back to they main attraction ,,, Diesel vs gas.

I have been going over the same issues for the past several months my self in trying to determine which is better in the long run. While it true the gas are lower cost up front when buying new you loose more value with them quicker with miles from towing.

A diesel on the other hand is higher cost up front but a diesel with 150K vs a gasser with 150 will garner more dollars as used trucks on resale market.

THis is why i am looking at 2002 ford f-250 SD PSD 7.3L XLT supercab 2 wd version with 152K miles for my future towing duties. this unit already has a elec trailer brake box and mounts for 5th wheel in bad along with air bags so i know it done some towing. In checking the carfax it appers the truck was taken care of for the most part..

It runs good, does not show any smoke at start up, when you open the oil filler cap there is no pressure. for the most part if OEM stock.

The stealersship is asking $13995 and nada is listing it at $11,925..
I plan to take it to a local diesel performance shop close by to check out and they take oil, trans, rearend, and antifreeze samples to send off for analyst for $125..

My point is I feel from reading all the posts in this thread, or almost all of them, the diesel is better suited for full-time use in pull a TT, especially out west, which is where we plan to go in some 5 yrs when we start to full-time..

in the mean time this will be an occasional driver with us getting a TT in 2-3 yrs for weekend, short week etc use.

I am not able to afford a new or almost new truck at some 28-35K. The difference between a 2002 and 2012 will buy a lot of diesel no matter what the price.

It was a tough and hard thought out process that lead to this point..

I do appreciate all the comments both for and against each type.. that is what make a forum like this so fun and interesting.

thanks a million and keep the comments coming..


You'll probably like the new truck. My next truck will most likely be a diesel as well. (Unless someone puts out a 5 liter or so DI turbo gasser, then it will be tougher choice.)

Don't get hung up on the "recoup additional cost at resale" baloney. Take your lumps and understand that added cost is just that, added cost. If you pay a $2000 premium for a diesel truck (4x4, whatever) now and sold it after 10years you would have to get a $5000 premium then to break even in a 10% economy. The value of money is time dependent.

And keep in mind it takes time to get fluid samples analyzed. You may wind up spending money on that only to find the vehicle has been sold before you find out if they tested good or bad. If your mechanic thinks it checks out, and you agree on a price with the dealer, just buy it.


’19 F350 SRW CCLB PSD Fx4
'00 F250, CC SWB 4x2, V-10 3.73LS. (sold)
'83 F100 SWB 4x2, 302 AOD 3.55. (parked)
'05 GMC Envoy 4x2 4.2 3.73L.
'12 Edge 2.0 Ecoboost
'15 Cherokee Trailhawk


carl2591

Garner NC

Senior Member

Joined: 11/22/2012

View Profile



Good Sam RV Club Member

Offline
Posted: 06/29/14 01:34pm Link  |  Quote  |  Print  |  Notify Moderator

that's what i will be doing and after the results come back decide on what fluids to change out.

In driving the truck, i have gassers now, it rides good, no funny smells , power seems good, no smoking when running over all it looks in good shape for the age. Just have to go with my gut and my time spent under the truck with flashlight looking for grease, oil leaks etc and it looked fine .front to back from below..

wish me luck and i am a member of the diesel club. [emoticon]

BlackSilver

East of Heaven, North of Hell

Senior Member

Joined: 12/18/2003

View Profile



Good Sam RV Club Member

Offline
Posted: 06/29/14 02:13pm Link  |  Quote  |  Print  |  Notify Moderator

carl2591 wrote:

that's what i will be doing and after the results come back decide on what fluids to change out.

In driving the truck, i have gassers now, it rides good, no funny smells , power seems good, no smoking when running over all it looks in good shape for the age. Just have to go with my gut and my time spent under the truck with flashlight looking for grease, oil leaks etc and it looked fine .front to back from below..

wish me luck and i am a member of the diesel club. [emoticon]


I think you made a good choice.


Hans, KØHB & Colleen, KØCKB
Master Chief Radioman, US Navy
Heartland Big Country camping trailer
3500HD Silverado Big Dooley LTZ Go-power by Max & Allie



waynec1957

North Central Indiana

Full Member

Joined: 06/25/2009

View Profile


Offline
Posted: 06/29/14 02:35pm Link  |  Quote  |  Print  |  Notify Moderator

carl2591 wrote:

that's what i will be doing and after the results come back decide on what fluids to change out.

In driving the truck, i have gassers now, it rides good, no funny smells , power seems good, no smoking when running over all it looks in good shape for the age. Just have to go with my gut and my time spent under the truck with flashlight looking for grease, oil leaks etc and it looked fine .front to back from below..

wish me luck and i am a member of the diesel club. [emoticon]


X-2 "Don't get hung up on the "recoup additional cost at resale" baloney."

I buy what I buy the way I like it, for me. I don't now nor have I ever worried what the next guy might like. I learned a long time ago, when it comes to trading in a vehicle, you're only going to get what the dealer can get at auction. I don't care how they juggle the numbers. They're just going to get a little more for a diesel.

That doesn't mean a guy won't find someone and make a little more on a private sale. But, I've never been one to mess with that. So what works for me might not work for someone else.


2013 Chevy Sliverado 2500 HD LS Crew Cab
Duramax/Allison, HD Tow Package, GCWR 24,500

2017 KZ Sportsmen S330 IK


Jarlaxle

New England

Senior Member

Joined: 11/18/2006

View Profile


Offline
Posted: 07/06/14 07:13am Link  |  Quote  |  Print  |  Notify Moderator

Just needed another DPF at work...according to the parts guy, it is $6400 for the part, plus a $2000 core charge. If the honeycomb is cracked, the core charge is lost.

Gas power looking better and better...


John and Elizabeth (Liz), with Briza the size XL tabby
St. Bernard Marm, cats Vierna and Maya...RIP. ">
Current rig:
1992 International Genesis school bus conversion

Reply to Topic  |  Subscribe  |  Print Page  |  Post New Topic  | 
Page of 469  
Prev  |  Next

Open Roads Forum  >  Tow Vehicles

 > Diesel vs gas......................
Search:   Advanced Search

Search only in Tow Vehicles


New posts No new posts
Closed, new posts Closed, no new posts
Moved, new posts Moved, no new posts

Adjust text size:




© 2025 CWI, Inc. © 2025 Good Sam Enterprises, LLC. All Rights Reserved.