Coast Resorts Open Roads Forum: Tow Vehicles: Diesel vs gas......................
Open Roads Forum Already a member? Login here.   If not, Register Today!  |  Help

Newest  |  Active  |  Popular  |  RVing FAQ Forum Rules  |  Forum Posting Help and Support  |  Contact  

Search:   Advanced Search

Search only in Tow Vehicles

Open Roads Forum  >  Tow Vehicles

 > Diesel vs gas......................

Reply to Topic  |  Subscribe  |  Print Page  |  Post New Topic  | 
Page of 469  
Prev  |  Next
Roadfrog

Chilliwack, BC Canada

Senior Member

Joined: 04/27/2001

View Profile


Offline
Posted: 06/23/04 10:08am Link  |  Quote  |  Print  |  Notify Moderator

Not sure if this was mentioned (didn't read all the posts)

Whatever I paid for the diesel option (6 g or so), I will MORE than double my return in resale, cost of fuel, longevity, etc. Factor in the other things mentioned, and it's a no brainer. Try accelerating up a mountain pass with a gasser. Diesels aren't effected by thinner air at higher elevations.

Diesels are also very easy and cheap to modify to make unbelievable increases in HP and torque. A tuner/chip, exhaust and intake will increase your hp and torque by up to 70% for about 1500 bucks.

It would be a far easier and shorter thread to respond to, by asking "what are the advantages of a gas engine over a diesel" -- Anyone hear crickets chirping in the background? ;-)

Been there, done that.


Cheers
Chris

1999 Winnebago Itasca Spirit 29N
1988 Campion Allante 195

BertP

Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Senior Member

Joined: 11/07/2003

View Profile



Posted: 06/23/04 11:01am Link  |  Quote  |  Print  |  Notify Moderator

Quote:

Not sure if this was mentioned (didn't read all the posts)

Whatever I paid for the diesel option (6 g or so), I will MORE than double my return in resale, cost of fuel, longevity, etc. Factor in the other things mentioned, and it's a no brainer. Try accelerating up a mountain pass with a gasser. Diesels aren't effected by thinner air at higher elevations.

This is a very misleading post. The fact that your engine does not lose power when climbing a mountain pass has nothing to do with the fact that it is a diesel and everything to do with the fact that it is turbocharged. It can be argued that that is a moot point because all of the current diesels are turbo'd and the gassers are not, but there may be many people reading this thread who are looking to buy a used diesel. They will be very surprise (and not too happy) to find out that the non-turbo's diesel they bought loses power climbing the mountain pass exactly the same way that a non-turbo'd gasser does.

On your trade in, I would not want to predict that. The type of engine that is in a vehicle is only one factor in determining its trade in value. Longevity is also not an issue depending on manufacturer since they are rated the same as the gassers - except for the CTD.

Quote:

Diesels are also very easy and cheap to modify to make unbelievable increases in HP and torque. A tuner/chip, exhaust and intake will increase your hp and torque by up to 70% for about 1500 bucks.

This part is true.

Quote:

It would be a far easier and shorter thread to respond to, by asking "what are the advantages of a gas engine over a diesel" -- Anyone hear crickets chirping in the background? ;-)

Been there, done that.

There have been many people who have indicated their preference for gassers, so this is not the cake walk you suggest. As someone else pointed out, gassers outsell diesels by an order of magnitude, so someone must prefer gassers over diesels.

Bert

TinTipi

Silvana, WA, USA

Senior Member

Joined: 06/12/2003

View Profile


Offline
Posted: 06/23/04 01:08pm Link  |  Quote  |  Print  |  Notify Moderator

Where you want your maximum horsepower and torque varies with the intended use. If you want to go really fast you want high horsepower at high RPM's. If you want to go over steep mountain passes you want more of your power at lower RPM's.

The arguements of Diesel vs. Gas and HP vs. Torque are far to vague. There are significant differences between the many gas and diesel engines. What matters is the comparison between two specific power plants and their respective power curves. Regardless of whether the engine is fueled by diesel or gas, what matters is does the power plant produce horsepower/torque where you need it.

As an example, I'll compare what I'm familiar with. The HO Cummins Turbo Diesel with 325 HP at 2,900 RPM and 600 ft lbs of Torque at 1,600 RPM vs. the (more power) Hemi with 345 HP at around 5,000 RPM and 375 ft lbs of Torque at 4,000+ RPM. The Hemi will leave my Cummins behind on the race track, but - hook some weight up behind them and head up a hill and I reach the top first. Why? Because, on a hill, the Hemi will never be able to get to it's maximum HP as it does not have the umphh at lower RPM's to allow it to accelerate in the higher gears. The Hemi, with enough weight behind it, just doesn't have enough power at lower RPM's to allow it to reach higher RPM's.

Towing side by side down the highway at 65 mph the Hemi will be turning around 3,000 RPM's - well shy of it's maximum HP and Torque Levels of 4-5,000 RPM's. The Cummins will be running around 2,000 RPM's - below it's maximum HP but above it's maximum Torque RPM. As we start up the really steep hill both vehicles will begin to slow (assuming they have enough weight behind them) and the Hemi will move further and further from it's ideal RPM while the Cummins will remain in the sweet spot and cruise on up the hill.

If the hill is steep enough and the trailer heavy enough the Hemi will have to downshift in order to increase RPM's. It will have to continue downshifting until it can hold the higher RPM's. The more the Cummins is slowed by the hill the more Torque it produces and the more likely it is to be able to maintain it's speed without downshifting. Now, to be fair, the Cummins will eventually encounter a hill steep enough or a trailer heavy enough to make it necessary to downshift also but it will take a bigger hill or a heavier trailer to make it happen.

Most people have towed with a gas engine at some point. Remember the problem of knowing that if you could just get the RPM's up to 3000 you could maintain your speed on the hill. Alas, when you shifted from 2nd to 3rd or 3rd to 4th the RPM's dropped to 2000 and at that RPM you didn't have the power to accelerate. So, you downshifted and the RPM's jumped and you ran them up to 4,000 and then shifted, the RPM's dropped to 2,500 and you began to slow again. You knew you had the horsepower, you just couldn't use it in the higher gears. The diesel experiences that problem to a significantly lesser degree, it has more power at lower RPM's to allow you to accelerate on that same hill, as you accelerate the torque drops but when you shift to a higher gear the RPM's drop back to your maximum torque level again. Put another way (warning: gross generalization) gas engines upshift (eg: 3rd to 4th) from high torque to low torque, diesels upshift from low torque to high torque.

The Hemi described above develops more power the faster you turn the engine. The faster you go the more power you have available to move the vehicle and break through the air. The Hemi's peak Torque is developed at an RPM outside or the normal range for the vehicle, the faster you turn the Hemi the more Torque you develop. The Cummins on the other hand develops it's peak Torque at the low end of the operating range, the faster you turn the engine the less Torque you produce. Neither one is better or worse, just designed differently and may be more suitable to different applications.

The same analogy can be used for accelerating from a stop. The Cummins will accelerate faster than the Hemi (when both have a heavy load behind them) because it has more HP and Torque at lower RPM's. Empty, a different story as each has more than enough to move the empty weight of the vehicle - the Hemi will have no problem making full use of it's higher horsepower and will quickly be able to get into and stay in it's sweet spot between 4 & 5,000 RPM.

Generally speaking, diesels produce more power at lower RPM's than do gas engines making them more suited to towing. Gas engines have more peak horsepower making them more suited to going fast. There are always exceptions so make sure you keep the generalizations in mind but compare actual figures.

Now, as far as Torque and Horsepower go:
Torque is a function of Horsepower and Horsepower is a function of Torque. If you know one you can calculate the other as long as you know the RPM at which it was produced.

Here is the formula: HP = (TQ * RPM)/5252

Or flipped around: TQ = (HP * 5252)/RPM

So, a given HP at a given RPM will always result in a given TQ figure. If two engines have the same HP at the same RPM, they will by definition have the same TQ.

Therefore: RPM is King!!!! Not really, it's just that, mathematically, HP and TQ are simply different representations of the same thing (physics definitions are different however). What really matters is what you want to do with the vehicle. If you want to race you want your power at high RPM's, if you want to tow you'll need more HP at lower RPM's to make sure you can get to the higher RPM's.

* This post was last edited 06/23/04 02:41pm by TinTipi *   View edit history


Erk, Shannon & Levi
2004.5 Dodge 3500 Quad Cab Short Box 4x4, SLT, HO Cummins, Auto, SRW, 3.73's, Tow Package, Power Tow Mirrors.
2003 Trail-Bay 24' BHDS, Twins (Honda EU2000i's)

BertP

Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Senior Member

Joined: 11/07/2003

View Profile



Posted: 06/23/04 02:37pm Link  |  Quote  |  Print  |  Notify Moderator

I saw that you addressed this post to me in another thread, but I thought a response here would be more appropriate. This is going to be long [emoticon]

Quote:

Where you want your maximum horsepower and torque varies with the intended use. If you want to go really fast you want high horsepower at high RPM's. If you want to go over steep mountain passes you want more of your power at lower RPM's.

While true, this is only part of the story. Do you need high rpm to go fast? No, you just need HP. Having said that, though, can you take a 1500HP@1800 rpm diesel out of a tank and put it in a McLaren F1? The McLaren usually has (I believe) 1000 HP, so we would be giving it a nice boost, but I suspect that a 2000 - 3000 lb engine that is shoe-horned into a 1000 lb car may scratch some paint. Would the car go faster with that engine? I don't know for certain, but my experience has been that vehicles don't go very fast when their wheels are horizontal....

Quote:

The arguements of Diesel vs. Gas and HP vs. Torque are far to vague. There are significant differences between the many gas and diesel engines. What matters is the comparison between two specific power plants and their respective power curves. Regardless of whether the engine is fueled by diesel or gas, what matters is does the power plant produce horsepower/torque where you need it.

Again, true, but how do you define "where you need it"? That, to a great extent, is defined by the rest of your drive train. If the drive train is designed for the characteristics of a particular engine, then that engine will perform well. If it is not, then sub standard performance will result. That is not dependent on the type of engine or what rpm it runs at just on how well the drive train matches the engine.

Quote:

As an example, I'll compare what I'm familiar with. The HO Cummins Turbo Diesel with 325 HP at 2,900 RPM and 600 ft lbs of Torque at 1,600 RPM vs. the (more power) Hemi with 345 HP at around 5,000 RPM and 375 ft lbs of Torque at 4,000+ RPM. The Hemi will leave my Cummins behind on the race track, but - hook some weight up behind them and head up a hill and I reach the top first. Why? Because, on a hill, the Hemi will never be able to get to it's maximum HP as it does not have the umphh at lower RPM's to allow it to accelerate in the higher gears. The Hemi, with enough weight behind it, just doesn't have enough power at lower RPM's to allow it to reach higher RPM's.

Again, that is dependent on the drive train design, not the engine. If the drive train allows the Hemi to produce its max power going up that hill, it will still outpull the CTD because there is more power getting to the ground. It requires HP to accellerate, not torque. If your engine can produce more HP than it is at the moment, then you can accellerate. If it cannot (for any reason) you will not be able to accellerate.

Quote:

Towing side by side down the highway at 65 mph the Hemi will be turning around 3,000 RPM's - well shy of it's maximum HP and Torque Levels of 4-5,000 RPM's. The Cummins will be running around 2,000 RPM's - below it's maximum HP but above it's maximum Torque RPM. As we start up the really steep hill both vehicles will begin to slow (assuming they have enough weight behind them) and the Hemi will move further and further from it's ideal RPM while the Cummins will remain in the sweet spot and cruise on up the hill.

If the hill is steep enough and the trailer heavy enough the Hemi will have to downshift in order to increase RPM's. It will have to continue downshifting until it can hold the higher RPM's. The more the Cummins is slowed by the hill the more Torque it produces and the more likely it is to be able to maintain it's speed without downshifting. Now, to be fair, the Cummins will eventually encounter a hill steep enough or a trailer heavy enough to make it necessary to downshift also but it will take a bigger hill or a heavier trailer to make it happen.

If the Hemi is kept in an rpm range where it devlops more power (HP) than the CTD, then it will be able to pull away from the CTD.

Quote:

Most people have towed with a gas engine at some point. Remember the problem of knowing that if you could just get the RPM's up to 3000 you could maintain your speed on the hill. Alas, when you shifted from 2nd to 3rd or 3rd to 4th the RPM's dropped to 2000 and at that RPM you didn't have the power to accelerate. So, you downshifted and the RPM's jumped and you ran them up to 4,000 and then shifted, the RPM's dropped to 2,500 and you began to slow again. You knew you had the horsepower, you just couldn't use it in the higher gears. The diesel experiences that problem to a significantly lesser degree, it has more power at lower RPM's to allow you to accelerate on that same hill, as you accelerate the torque drops but when you shift to a higher gear the RPM's drop back to your maximum torque level again. Put another way (warning: gross generalization) gas engines shift from high torque to low torque, diesels shift from low torque to high torque.

Actually, the diesels experience this phenomenum to a greater degree than the gassers because they have a narrower operating rpm range than the gassers. If your CTD lost 2000 rpm on a shift starting at 2900 rpm, it would be turning at 900 rpm. If the Hemi lost 2000 rpm on a shift starting at 5000 rpm, it would be at 3000 rpm. Which engine would be producing the higher amount of power after such a shift? That's why the newer trannies have 5 or 6 speeds: to decrease the rpm (and power) loss on a shift.

Quote:

The same analogy can be used for accelerating from a stop. The Cummins will accelerate faster than the Hemi (when both have a heavy load behind them) because it has more HP and Torque at lower RPM's. Empty, a different story as each has more than enough to move the empty weight of the vehicle - the Hemi will have no problem making full use of it's higher horsepower and will quickly be able to get into and stay in it's sweet spot between 4 & 5,000 RPM.

Generally speaking, diesels produce more power at lower RPM's than do gas engines making them more suited to towing. Gas engines have more peak horsepower making them more suited to going fast. There are always exceptions so make sure you keep the generalizations in mind but compare actual figures.

You cannot discuss the ability of an engine to accellerate under load without considering the drive train. Either engine can be configured with a drive train that will allow it to out accellerate the other. The important spec is not how much torque the engine develops but how much power it can put to the ground.

Quote:

Now, as far as Torque and Horsepower go:
Torque is a function of Horsepower and Horsepower is a function of Torque. If you know one you can calculate the other as long as you know the RPM at which it was produced.

Here is the formula: HP = (TQ * RPM)/5252

Or flipped around: TQ = (HP * 5252)/RPM

So, a given HP at a given RPM will always result in a given TQ figure. If two engines have the same HP at the same RPM, they will by definition have the same TQ.

Therefore: RPM is King!!!! Not really, it's just that, mathematically, HP and TQ are simply different representations of the same thing (physics definitions are different however). What really matters is what you want to do with the vehicle. If you want to race you want your power at high RPM's, if you want to tow you'll need more HP at lower RPM's to make sure you can get to the higher RPM's.

Absolutely accurate.

marc_w

Central, MA

New Member

Joined: 06/21/2004

View Profile



Posted: 06/23/04 03:20pm Link  |  Quote  |  Print  |  Notify Moderator

I just wanted to note, gas engines can get good mileage too.

I have a LQ9 6 liter in my Silverado. The truck is all-wheel drive, with 4.10 gears. Vehicle has been said to weight 5,300lbs.

Granted I drive almost all backroads, I average 20mpg if I don't play around too much. My all time high has been 22.3mpg a few weeks back.

I have yet to tow any significan weight - give me two weeks, and I'll report back with my towing mileage for a 5,000lb load on a 200 mile trip.

Mods to the truck: Drop in free-flow air filter, B&B dual exhaust (tight 2.25" tail pipes help lowend power a lot), NGK TR55 sparkplugs, Taylor plug wires, Flex-a-Lite electric fans, and custom part-throttle computer tuning.

TinTipi

Silvana, WA, USA

Senior Member

Joined: 06/12/2003

View Profile


Offline
Posted: 06/23/04 03:39pm Link  |  Quote  |  Print  |  Notify Moderator

BertP,

Good point bringing the drive train into the equasion. I am guilty of oversimplifying the issue. Since most of us will simply use what the manufacturers supply and not change the entire drive train to make full use of the power plants potential I just take the drive train as a given and not a component that can be changed.

The only point you made that I would disagree with is that if you had the right drive train the Hemi would outpull the Cummins on the hill. In theory what you say is entirely correct. In practice that would require a drivetrain that would keep the engine running at nearly 5,000 RPM's - that meets the very technical definition of "screamin". That drive train would require many, many gears and be provided at a very high cost and is not currently available to most people.

Two thoughts that I think need to be considered:
(1) the Cummins produces it's maximum HP and TQ inside of it's normal operating range and the Hemi produces it's peaks outside of it's normal operating range. So given the reality of the drive train that you have to work with when you purchase a Hemi you will not be able to make full use of the power it has available.
(2) the Cummins, with the drive train provided, has more torque after an upshift than it did before the shift. With the Hemi that is reversed. The Cummins will upshift at something between 2,000 and 2,500 RPM's depending on how hard you are accelerating. When it does the RPM's drop down towards it's peak torque RPM of 1600. The Hemi shifts at 2,500 to 3,000 RPM and the RPM's drop - it is never allowed to approach it's peaks near 5,000 RPM.

To solve the problem the Hemi would have to have a drive train that allowed it to run up to 6,000 RPM's and then drop the RPM's down to 5,000 or so when it upshifted. That would allow it to return to it's peak power. You are correct that it is possible, it just doesn't pass the sniff test for being realistic.

BertP

Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Senior Member

Joined: 11/07/2003

View Profile



Posted: 06/23/04 04:25pm Link  |  Quote  |  Print  |  Notify Moderator

Quote:

BertP,

Good point bringing the drive train into the equasion. I am guilty of oversimplifying the issue. Since most of us will simply use what the manufacturers supply and not change the entire drive train to make full use of the power plants potential I just take the drive train as a given and not a component that can be changed.

But, we can use what the manufacturers supply. What I was referring to was not some exotic gearing setup but just a tranny and RE that are optimized for the engine. To some extent, we have that now with the various RE ratios available. If the tranny ratios were a little better, I think it would match much better.

Quote:

The only point you made that I would disagree with is that if you had the right drive train the Hemi would outpull the Cummins on the hill. In theory what you say is entirely correct. In practice that would require a drivetrain that would keep the engine running at nearly 5,000 RPM's - that meets the very technical definition of "screamin". That drive train would require many, many gears and be provided at a very high cost and is not currently available to most people.

You wouldn't need many more gears at all. I think that the gearing available in the Allison would be almost perfect for the Hemi. Plus, the Hemi can produce usable power across a wider rpm range than the CTD. You have about 1500 rpm to play with on the CTD (1400-2900) but the Hemi is good for around 2000 rpm (3000-5000). Both of those are guesses, but I think they are fairly close.

Quote:

Two thoughts that I think need to be considered:
(1) the Cummins produces it's maximum HP and TQ inside of it's normal operating range and the Hemi produces it's peaks outside of it's normal operating range. So given the reality of the drive train that you have to work with when you purchase a Hemi you will not be able to make full use of the power it has available.

Sure you could. The LB7 DMax produces its max torque qt 1800 rpm. If you are travelling on a secondary highway with a speed limit of 50, it will be turning less than 1800 rpm. Besides, it is not important to be at a point higher than the max torque point. My 6l got excellent gas mileage at less than 2000 rpm on the highway which is far below its max torque point.

Quote:

(2) the Cummins, with the drive train provided, has more torque after an upshift than it did before the shift. With the Hemi that is reversed. The Cummins will upshift at something between 2,000 and 2,500 RPM's depending on how hard you are accelerating. When it does the RPM's drop down towards it's peak torque RPM of 1600. The Hemi shifts at 2,500 to 3,000 RPM and the RPM's drop - it is never allowed to approach it's peaks near 5,000 RPM.

I can't speak for the Cummins because I have never seen a power curve for it, but the LB7 DMax produces a max of 520 ft lb from 1800 - 3000 rpm. The torque curve is perfectly flat. So, if you have a max power shift that stays in that rpm range, the torque value will be exactly the same after the shift as before it. Usually, only gassers will experience a torque increase after a shift and that is only of the shift occurs at a point above their max HP point.

Quote:

To solve the problem the Hemi would have to have a drive train that allowed it to run up to 6,000 RPM's and then drop the RPM's down to 5,000 or so when it upshifted. That would allow it to return to it's peak power. You are correct that it is possible, it just doesn't pass the sniff test for being realistic.

But, the diesels do not up shift into a point of max power either. Any up shift causes a decrease in rpm. Any decrease in rpm on a diesel causes a loss of power. A gasser can increase power on an upshift as you outlined, but it is not necessary nor even wanted. If you go that far above the max power point on a Hemi, you will have lost a fair amount of power because it falls off above themax power point (hence the name [emoticon])

Bert

johnnyo4

NJ

Full Member

Joined: 06/07/2003

View Profile


Offline
Posted: 06/23/04 08:02pm Link  |  Quote  |  Print  |  Notify Moderator

I bought a diesel a year and 1/2 ago. knowing I was going from a small 21 ft fold out to a 28' 5th.

It boils down to that diesels have more torque and better fuel economy when towing over a gas engine.
My experience:
My diesel hooked up to the 21 footer was almost overkill. It was like a trailer was not even hooked up. Oh it was nice and I loved it. but the diesel-allison combo is a $5K option so is it worth it? That would be totally up to you. Perhaps if you tow a lot, even with a small trailer it would be worth it.

We now that I have a 28' 5th (32' front to back)(I can't figure why they rate 5th's that way). I am really glad that I have a diesel. Hands down it is the way to go when towing heavier trailers, especially if you tow a lot or over long distances.

My hunble opinion is that I tow a lot and during the summer, I average going camping every other weekend and 3-4 solid weeks a year. So it is worth it for me. I'll always own a diesel as long as I tow.


Johnny O
2003 Silverado 2500HD D/A 4x4 CC SB
2004 Coachman Chaparral 281BHS
Pullrite 24K Superglide
">

millerliteliker

Longview, TX

Full Member

Joined: 12/15/2003

View Profile






Posted: 06/23/04 09:21pm Link  |  Quote  |  Print  |  Notify Moderator

As the owner of BOTH diesel and gas powered 1 ton pickups, and Class 6, 7, & 8 trucks, I can tell you there is a place for both in heavy duty pickups. I "like" both types of engines.

My personal choice is a 2003 GMC 2500HD crewcab with a 8.1L gas engine with the Allison transmission. I put the K&N filter kit on it, headers, and dual exhaust. Unfortunately I don't use it nearly often enough towing my 5th wheel or bass boat. But I drive it EVERY DAY. I like blowing the doors off other pickups at red lights. I have to admit that that big block really makes a pickup feel good. The "clattering" of a diesel pickup really does nothing for me.

Now, when I retire and pull something all the time, I am sure that I will buy a diesel pickup.

But really, this talk about diesels getting better gas mileage is crap. Think about this - we all have spent $45,000 on our 30' 5th wheels, $40,000 on our tow vehicles, and in my case another $30,000 for a boat. Why in the heck is ANYONE on this board concerned about gas mileage!! Think about how insane you sound! There is nothing any of us on this board have done that makes rational financial sense!

Believe me, if we were concerned about saving money RV'ing and fishing sure ain't the way to go about it.

We do it because we can and because we love it. Now, excuse me, because I have to figure out how I am going to pay my Texaco bill.


2009 Chevrolet 3500HD DA LTZ DRW 4X4 Crew Cab
2005 GMC 2500HD DA SLT Crew Cab
2004 Cedar Creek 32BHBS

forddude

Kennewick Wa

Full Member

Joined: 07/12/2002

View Profile


Offline
Posted: 06/24/04 01:42am Link  |  Quote  |  Print  |  Notify Moderator

I will say that my gasser is almost 30 years old and runs as well if not better than it did new. With only 100kmiles on it, we should get a few more years out of it before I have to do any engine or tranny work. We get about 5.5mpg towing and don't drive it much otherwise. It has a/c that works good. If it had more gears in the transmission, It could pull as well as any diesel. It has the torque and hp available at 3200 rpm and at 14,500gcvw it will maintain 52mph up a 7%grade in second gear at 3200rpm. But if I lose speed becaues of slower traffic or corners, then I am going to have to let it fall to 1st and build the rpm back to 3200 before shifting to 2nd. It needs more gearing. Anyway, if I were ever to do a lot of towing I would probably buy diesel, but I can buy a lot of gas for brownie until then.


2004 Keystone Cougar 280BH powered by Yammie EF2800I all hauled w/ '76 F250 sc 4x2 with 3.55/1 Limited Slip somewhere in the Pacific Northwest.

Reply to Topic  |  Subscribe  |  Print Page  |  Post New Topic  | 
Page of 469  
Prev  |  Next

Open Roads Forum  >  Tow Vehicles

 > Diesel vs gas......................
Search:   Advanced Search

Search only in Tow Vehicles


New posts No new posts
Closed, new posts Closed, no new posts
Moved, new posts Moved, no new posts

Adjust text size:




© 2024 CWI, Inc. © 2024 Good Sam Enterprises, LLC. All Rights Reserved.