jeffc2023
Seattle, WA
New Member
Joined: 09/26/2023
View Profile
 Offline
|
Hi there, I'm new to the forum and would really appreciate your advice. I have a 2000 Freightliner MT45 step van that I converted myself and I'm shopping around for RV insurance. I came across a good deal from Progressive for full time RV insurance and I meet all the requirements EXCEPT for one statement:
Quote:I confirm that any motorhome listed on this quote:
Is not the only registered motor vehicle in the household.
I talked to an agent and he said that I basically have to own another vehicle, but I don't have to provide any further details to start the quote.
Does anyone have experience with this requirement by Progressive? Basically what I'm concerned about is if I have this policy without a second vehicle that I own and I make a claim, will Progressive ask about my second vehicle and potentially deny my entire claim?
Thanks for any advice,
Jeff
|
rk911
DuPage County
Senior Member
Joined: 05/30/2004
View Profile
Good Sam RV Club Member
Offline
|
just off the top of my head...what you're describing sounds like insurance fraud. and that's a cime. i would speak with one of their agents about that requirement.
Rich
Ham Radio, Sport Pilot, Retired 9-1-1 Call Center Administrator
_________________________________
2016 Itasca Suncruiser 38Q
'46 Willys CJ2A
'23 Jeep Wrangler JL
'10 Jeep Liberty KK
& MaggieThe Wonder Beagle
|
rjstractor
Maple Valley, WA
Senior Member
Joined: 01/20/2003
View Profile
Offline
|
If you haven't already, try calling the Washington Insurance Commissioners hotline at 800-562-6900. They may be able to answer your question more accurately than an internet forum. (especially this one) ![[emoticon]](http://www.coastresorts.com/sharedcontent/cfb/images/wink.gif "wink")
|
CA Traveler
The Western States
Senior Member
Joined: 01/03/2004
View Profile
Offline
|
Excellent points. Are you very sure this is not a fraud???
2009 Holiday Rambler 42' Scepter with ISL 400 Cummins
750 Watts Solar Morningstar MPPT 60 Controller
2014 Grand Cherokee Overland
Bob
|
wa8yxm
Davison Michigan (East of Flint)
Senior Member
Joined: 07/04/2006
View Profile
Offline
|
I do not think it is fraud.
I think they don't want you using your rather expensive RV as a "Daily Driver" and want to be sure you have a "Daily Driver" for things like going to Church on Sunday or running to the store for a pound of hotdogs.
Home was where I park it. but alas the.
2005 Damon Intruder 377 Alas declared a total loss
after a semi "nicked" it. Still have the radios
Kenwood TS-2000, ICOM ID-5100, ID-51A+2, ID-880 REF030C most times
|
|
|
valhalla360
No paticular place.
Senior Member
Joined: 08/19/2009
View Profile
Good Sam RV Club Member
|
wa8yxm wrote:I do not think it is fraud.
I think they don't want you using your rather expensive RV as a "Daily Driver" and want to be sure you have a "Daily Driver" for things like going to Church on Sunday or running to the store for a pound of hotdogs.
Yes, it's likely an effort on their part to assess how much and what type of driving you are likely to do with your RV.
Insurance is ultimately a game where they try to estimate the odds of you getting into a crash (or otherwise making a claim) and then setting the premium to cover the resulting costs plus overhead and some profit. They do this while state insurance boards regulate what they can and cannot consider.
Your average RV probably spends 80-90% of it's miles on freeways or low volume rural roads where the potential for a crash is wildly lower than driving in urban stop & go traffic. So if you are just using it as an RV, the risk is much lower than as a daily driver.
They may never realize or make an issue of it but lying on the application is certainly fraud. Would they deny a claim because of it...depends on the state insurance regulations. If it's a minor fender bender, probably not. If it's a multimillion dollar death and destruction claim, they will probably give it a try.
Tammy & Mike
Ford F250 V10
2021 Gray Wolf
Gemini Catamaran 34'
Full Time spliting time between boat and RV
|
Grit dog
Black Diamond, WA
Senior Member
Joined: 05/06/2013
View Profile
Offline
|
wa8yxm wrote:I do not think it is fraud.
I think they don't want you using your rather expensive RV as a "Daily Driver" and want to be sure you have a "Daily Driver" for things like going to Church on Sunday or running to the store for a pound of hotdogs.
Bingo. This and nothing more.
And the OP and people like him are the reason they have this “rule” as RV insurance is way less $ than auto insurance just like pleasure vehicles are less than daily drivers.
If the OP were just to insure it as the daily driver that it is (and he can since it’s a homebrew Moho anyways) and not try to get the cheap RV rate, there wouldn’t be this qualifier on the policy.
Regarding whether the ins co can or will require verification. In my experience they wouldn’t, but could if it meant being able to deny a claim.
Been dealing with this similarly for years with teenagers in the house and what vehicle is their “primary” vechicle. Same concept different scenario.
2016 Ram 2500, MotorOps.ca EFIlive tuned, 5” turbo back, 6" lift on 37s
2017 Heartland Torque T29 - Sold.
Couple of Arctic Fox TCs - Sold
|
Grit dog
Black Diamond, WA
Senior Member
Joined: 05/06/2013
View Profile
Offline
|
And slightly off topic, but who drives a bread truck around as a daily….unless delivering bread or UPS packages?
|
wapiticountry
Mountain West
Senior Member
Joined: 10/02/2011
View Profile
Good Sam RV Club Member
Offline
|
Their company, their rules. Lie on your application and have a fender bender, the claim will get paid. Lie and kill a bus load of grade schoolers, the insurance company is going to fight you to the death.
|
rk911
DuPage County
Senior Member
Joined: 05/30/2004
View Profile
Good Sam RV Club Member
Offline
|
wa8yxm wrote:I do not think it is fraud.
I think they don't want you using your rather expensive RV as a "Daily Driver" and want to be sure you have a "Daily Driver" for things like going to Church on Sunday or running to the store for a pound of hotdogs.
It's fraud IF the OP claims to have a non-existing second vehicle in order to qualify for the policy and then submits a claim under that policy.
|
|
|
