Coast Resorts Open Roads Forum: Class C Motorhomes: mercedes sprinter chassis
Open Roads Forum Already a member? Login here.   If not, Register Today!  |  Help

Newest  |  Active  |  Popular  |  RVing FAQ Forum Rules  |  Forum Posting Help and Support  |  Contact  

Search:   Advanced Search

Search only in Class C Motorhomes

Open Roads Forum  >  Class C Motorhomes  >  Class C

 > mercedes sprinter chassis

Reply to Topic  |  Subscribe  |  Print Topic  |  Post New Topic  | 
Page of 4  
Prev  |  Next
Ed_Gee

Central Oregon coast

Senior Member

Joined: 01/14/2015

View Profile


Offline
Posted: 01/22/18 12:48pm Link  |  Quote  |  Print  |  Notify Moderator

Thank you, Old Crows, for the link to the Winnie forums. It is very useful!!


Ed - on the Central Oregon coast
2018 Winnebago Fuse 23A
Scion xA toad

ezrider999

Florida

New Member

Joined: 01/20/2018

View Profile


Offline
Posted: 01/22/18 03:12pm Link  |  Quote  |  Print  |  Notify Moderator

I'm very interested in this topic because I've been conducting research for months on all the class-C's built on the MB Sprinter. I've owned several Mercedes diesel cars over 40 years and they all have been rock solid. On paper I thought the Tiffin Wayfarer 24WQ (queen bed in a slide out the back) would be my choice on the Tiffin reputation alone. It certainly has several nice standard features such as diesel generator, but it has practically no basement storage. Many other brands, such as the Dynamax Isata 3, do a little better on basement storage, but not much better, then I saw the Thor Synergy Sprinter SP24 (the same configuration with the queen bed in a rear slide). That model has a HUGE storage compartment that can be accessed from either side or the rear. Add their Summit Upgrade Package, and it still prices out way lower ($10 - $15K) than the Tiffin. It's my new favorite, but other Thor products have several fair to poor reviews. Thor makes the Sprinter C in three different price tiers, and Synergy is their "luxury" model. I see quite a few on the road. Are there any Synergy owners that can share their experiences with Thor's build quality and warranty service on the Synergy Sprinter? Much thanks!!

CharlesinGA

South of Atlanta, Georgia

Senior Member

Joined: 01/12/2016

View Profile


Offline
Posted: 01/22/18 05:11pm Link  |  Quote  |  Print  |  Notify Moderator

The difference in fuel economy does not tell the true story. Given how much higher priced diesel is than gasoline, (lets say $2.43 gas/$3.05 diesel) and a fuel mileage at the same speed, of 11 mpg for the V10 vs 15 mpg for the Sprinter, the cost per mile difference is only about TWO CENTS per mile.

My older WBO View with the five cylinder diesel get better fuel economy at the cost of performance, vs the newer V6 powered Sprinter chassis motorhomes. Over the past 10K miles (almost exactly) since I purchased it, I have averaged 17.09 mpg, but a good bit of that is lower speed 55mph state highway driving and some local driving. On my 3700 mile trip to the Black Hills and back the mileage varied depending on terrain, wind, etc, but generally the interstate driving at 63-66 mph netted me 16.5 mpg as an average. (its all in a spreadsheet).

All of that being said, If I were looking to buy a motorhome today, I would be looking at a ten year old Class C on a Ford E450 chassis (4 inch wider track than an E350) and way wider track than a Sprinter, and a whole bunch of other reasons. This is my first RV and I went into it saying that I didn't want to get stuck with something that got horrible gas mileage in case gas went out of $ight again.

Truth is, I want to get away from a MH altogether and get a decent tow vehicle (2500 something.... diesel) and a 22-25 ft travel trailer. The Unicorns just haven't brought it to me yet.

Charles


'03 Ram 2500 CTD, 5.9HO six speed, PacBrake Exh Brake, std cab, long bed, Leer top and 2008 Bigfoot 25B21RB.. previously (both gone) 2008 Thor/Dutchman Freedom Spirit 180 & 2007 Winnebago View 23H Motorhome.

docsbrown

Florida

New Member

Joined: 09/09/2006

View Profile


Offline
Posted: 01/23/18 10:40am Link  |  Quote  |  Print  |  Notify Moderator

I am loving all the answers, they are giving us the different point of view we were looking for.
to give some more information, we are thinking to go again with a diesel, because it what we always used for our MH. we bought a class A gasser at one point and it went back for a trade in less than 3 weeks.
I know that the sprinter is not a DP but it is a proven chassis for over 10 years.
I know there are differences in the buildings craft of the various manufactures, that it what brought us to the Wayfarer, but the cargo capacity is just not there.
are the Synergy by Thor and the Melbourne Prestige by Jayco comparable in quality?

pnichols

The Other California

Senior Member

Joined: 04/26/2005

View Profile



Good Sam RV Club Member


Posted: 01/23/18 07:01pm Link  |  Quote  |  Print  |  Notify Moderator

Here's my comments regarding a Class B+ or Class C RV built on a Sprinter chassis:

1. Coach walls and steps are too low to the ground - how you gonna take them reliably off paved roads?
2. Too tall for their dually track-width in the rear - they look unstable side-to-side.
3. Difficult to find emergency servicing when something goes wrong a long way from home.
4. They're not basement-design motorhomes - where's the several smaller outside storage cabinets that are actually tall enough to fit much into (in addition to the single main one that they all have)?
5. I don't think that the double coach batteries are right under the doorstep - accessible from the outside or inside, rain or shine ... and kept a bit warm from being located just under the floor of the coach in cold weather. (Warm batteries perform better in the winter - which is when you need them most to perform up to their full potential.)
6. If you want one with a stronger coach structure you must get one without slides. But without slides, they are just too narrow to get around in.
7. The commonly available Ford E450 and Chevy 4500 chassis under a motorhome means you can pretty much carry anything you want in them if you have one of those two chassis under a Class B+ or Class C motorhome up to around 28 feet long.
8. Diesel is available in whole lot of places but not "everywhere". Gasoline is available in just about every little podunk U.S. town.
9. Not a lot of the Sprinter based rigs have a full cabover sleeper bed. You may have to search hard for a cabover bed one that also has the other features you might want.
10. It unfortunately may not be recommeded to idle the Sprinter engine an hour or two in order to take advantage of it's large alternator in order to quietly and quickly charge the coach battery bank in noise sensitive drycamping situations where solar won't do it and where the built-in generator may be too load. This idling limitation does not exist, for instance, with the Ford V10.
11. For what it's worth speaking from experience, the Ford V10 pulling our small Class C has continued to pull strong so far up to and through a 11,300 foot pass in Colorado.

* This post was edited 01/24/18 03:55pm by pnichols *


2005 E450 Itasca 24V Class C

Cider

Central Oregon

Full Member

Joined: 07/08/2009

View Profile



Good Sam RV Club Member

Offline
Posted: 01/25/18 10:38am Link  |  Quote  |  Print  |  Notify Moderator

pnichols wrote:

Here's my comments regarding a Class B+ or Class C RV built on a Sprinter chassis:

1. Coach walls and steps are too low to the ground - how you gonna take them reliably off paved roads?
We have not had any issues with our Forest River 2400R MBS going down gravel roads. Like any RV down a gravel road, you need to pay attention to where you are going and the road conditions. Height has not been an issue.
2. Too tall for their dually track-width in the rear - they look unstable side-to-side.
If the unit is equipped with antiwar bars, that problem is not an issue. Ours has the Hellwig setup on it and does not have that effect, unless you are crossing uneven drives in / out of parking lots.
3. Difficult to find emergency servicing when something goes wrong a long way from home.
That can be a point of consideration for the MBS setup as "authorized" service locations are not immediately available coast to coast. However, MB does have road service and will transport to nearest authorized service center if it is an issue with the driveline. This is the only thing I consider to be a PITA with the unit.
4. They're not basement-design motorhomes - where's the several smaller outside storage cabinets that are actually tall enough to fit much into (in addition to the single main one that they all have)?
This is true on almost all MBS units with the exception of the 2400R model. We have enough space that we could overload the untold total CC if we are not careful with the full rear compartment.
5. I don't think that the double coach batteries are right under the doorstep - accessible from the outside or inside, rain or shine ... and kept a bit warm from being located just under the floor of the coach in cold weather. (Warm batteries perform better in the winter - which is when you need them most to perform up to their full potential.)
Our batteries are under the entry way steps, so are enclosed.
6. If you want one with a stronger coach structure you must get one without slides. But without slides, they are just too narrow to get around in.
Not sure I could argue this point very well.
7. The commonly available Ford E450 and Chevy 4500 chassis under a motorhome means you can pretty much carry anything you want in them if you have one of those two chassis under a Class B+ or Class C motorhome up to around 28 feet long.
True - the gas engines models do offer more overall CC than the MBS series do. But then, how much "stuff" do you really need? For our last trip, we carried items we never even used, or thought about using while traveling. Experience will dictate what you really need to have and not have.
8. Diesel is available in whole lot of places but not "everywhere". Gasoline is available in just about every little podunk U.S. town.
I have been running diesel rigs, truck / RV for over 20 years and have never had a problem getting diesel fuel. On the MBS, you do have to be careful what you use as MB does not want you to run anything over B5 biodiesel. Personally, I always use ULSD. There are apps that will show what fuels are available for trip planning purposes.
9. Not a lot of the Sprinter based rigs have a full cabover sleeper bed. You may have to search hard for a cabover bed one that also has the other features you might want.
This is true, but there are many models that do, as is the case with ours. Ours has a weight capacity of 450 pounds and a person 6 foot tall can sleep there. Realistically, this would be for kids, but we use our for storage for bulky, light weight items.
10. It unfortunately may not be recommeded to idle the Sprinter engine an hour or two in order to take advantage of it's large alternator in order to quietly and quickly charge the coach battery bank in noise sensitive drycamping situations where solar won't do it and where the built-in generator may be too load. This idling limitation does not exist, for instance, with the Ford V10.
That's why most class C's have a generator on board. MB does not recommend idling the engine for long periods of time as it is detrimental to the engine.
11. For what it's worth speaking from experience, the Ford V10 pulling our small Class C has continued to pull strong so far up to and through a 11,300 foot pass in Colorado.

We crossed the continental divide 8 times last summer, towing a Jeep
Wrangler - no issues.


This is not meant to be argumentative, just a response as an owner of a FR MBS 2400R with experience using the unit. We are very pleased with the unit as to comfort, appearance, drivability, performance and fuel mileage. Hope this helps in your decision making process.


2017 Tiffin Allegro RED 33 AA
2020 JLUR
Roadmaster Baseplate
Sterling AT Tow Bar
Demco Air Force One Brake System

Oldtymeflyr

Arapahoe Hills, CO

Senior Member

Joined: 04/18/2004

View Profile



Posted: 02/06/18 08:10am Link  |  Quote  |  Print  |  Notify Moderator

pnichols wrote:

Here's my comments regarding a Class B+ or Class C RV built on a Sprinter chassis:

1. Coach walls and steps are too low to the ground - how you gonna take them reliably off paved roads?

Response: Not a problem. A rough two track, not good for any Class C.

2. Too tall for their dually track-width in the rear - they look unstable side-to-side.
3. Difficult to find emergency servicing when something goes wrong a long way from home.

Response: With modern computer operated vehicles-even a GM/Ford owner can have problems in the middle of nowhere. No question there are more GM/Ford shops. The key is a good vehicle in the first place, good maintenance, and good towing insurance. Freightliner (owned by MB) will perform service if there is not an available MB dealer. Also there are a lot of specialty shops that deal with the Sprinter. The same problem can be be said for Toyota, Honda, KIA etc. GM/Ford are more numerous.

4. They're not basement-design motorhomes - where's the several smaller outside storage cabinets that are actually tall enough to fit much into (in addition to the single main one that they all have)?

Response: We have more than enough storage, its one of the reasons we liked the Thor 25H/L.

5. I don't think that the double coach batteries are right under the doorstep - accessible from the outside or inside, rain or shine ... and kept a bit warm from being located just under the floor of the coach in cold weather. (Warm batteries perform better in the winter - which is when you need them most to perform up to their full potential.)

Response: Batteries are under the step.

6. If you want one with a stronger coach structure you must get one without slides. But without slides, they are just too narrow to get around in.

Response: This is a common issue to all RV's, I am not sure its a problem.

7. The commonly available Ford E450 and Chevy 4500 chassis under a motorhome means you can pretty much carry anything you want in them if you have one of those two chassis under a Class B+ or Class C motorhome up to around 28 feet long.

8. Diesel is available in whole lot of places but not "everywhere". Gasoline is available in just about every little podunk U.S. town.

Response: Not really a problem.

9. Not a lot of the Sprinter based rigs have a full cabover sleeper bed. You may have to search hard for a cabover bed one that also has the other features you might want.

Response: Thor, Forest River, Coachman have numerous cabover models. I am sure there are others.

10. It unfortunately may not be recommeded to idle the Sprinter engine an hour or two in order to take advantage of it's large alternator in order to quietly and quickly charge the coach battery bank in noise sensitive drycamping situations where solar won't do it and where the built-in generator may be too load. This idling limitation does not exist, for instance, with the Ford V10.

Response: I don't like idling any engine. Time on an engine is time on an engine. It takes a lot of hours even with a big alternator to properly charge a battery. When off the grid, we use solar(its worked exceptionally well, even in the sun deprived areas of eastern US in the winter)for most of our electrical needs and have an inverter when necessary. Our backup is a diesel generator. We do not use the generator to charge batteries.

11. For what it's worth speaking from experience, the Ford V10 pulling our small Class C has continued to pull strong so far up to and through a 11,300 foot pass in Colorado.

Response: Probably not a problem for a Ford V10 with a small Class C. Every NA engine including the V10 has lost at least 33% of its power, some claim up to 44%, just a fact of nature. In a heavy rig at altitude the loss will be felt.



In most respects it just a matter of what the owner likes and dislikes. We like our Thor/Sprinter.

* This post was last edited 02/06/18 08:33am by Oldtymeflyr *   View edit history

pnichols

The Other California

Senior Member

Joined: 04/26/2005

View Profile



Good Sam RV Club Member


Posted: 02/06/18 01:05pm Link  |  Quote  |  Print  |  Notify Moderator

Oldtymeflyr wrote:

In most respects it just a matter of what the owner likes and dislikes. We like our Thor/Sprinter.


Granted .... but part of what the opinions and experiences of others - as expressed in these forums - should be doing is helping folks to maybe scratch their heads a bit and rethink what they like or dislike.

(At least that's what happens to me when I read about what others are saying and doing. [emoticon] )

* This post was edited 02/06/18 06:10pm by pnichols *

Commerce

Alabama

Senior Member

Joined: 03/07/2004

View Profile



Good Sam RV Club Member

Offline
Posted: 04/29/18 10:13pm Link  |  Quote  |  Print  |  Notify Moderator

In my current DP I have an exhaust brake and LOVE it for use on steep grades , my question is since these units don't have an exhaust brake how have they handled on long grades and can you manually gear down in them ?

loggenrock

New Hampshire

Senior Member

Joined: 06/28/2007

View Profile





Offline
Posted: 04/30/18 09:14pm Link  |  Quote  |  Print  |  Notify Moderator

I find my B+ on the Sprinter chassis does well, as long as I back it down speed-wise before the start of the descent, and downshift appropriately. So yes, you can manually downshift.


Two and a hound in a 2015 Coachmen Prism "B+"...pushed by '09 Suby Forester
First 50 done, working on the second pass! Nunavut - we'll see...!
2005-2015 Roadtrek 190P
1993-2005 Northstar Soft-Side TC
1989-1993 Backpacks & Tents!
1967-1977 Family TT's



Reply to Topic  |  Subscribe  |  Print Topic  |  Post New Topic  | 
Page of 4  
Prev  |  Next

Open Roads Forum  >  Class C Motorhomes  >  Class C

 > mercedes sprinter chassis
Search:   Advanced Search

Search only in Class C Motorhomes


New posts No new posts
Closed, new posts Closed, no new posts
Moved, new posts Moved, no new posts

Adjust text size:




© 2025 CWI, Inc. © 2025 Good Sam Enterprises, LLC. All Rights Reserved.