DSteiner51

Wooster, Oh

Senior Member

Joined: 01/30/2004

View Profile


Good Sam RV Club Member
|
rhagfo wrote:
Dang you two, just accept that year for year a Diesel will out tow a gasser!
I would put each of the big threes, diesels up against their gas engines, no match!
I pull a 11K fiver up 7% grades, and can accelerate to the 55 mph speed limit while doing so, only addition to my 01, is a simple Power Puck 50 hp and about 150 ft. lb. of torque, running 3.55 gears.
If it was gas with those gears it would be doing 35 mph at the top of the hill! I hate to think what it would do with 4.10's!!!
I've run both gas and diesel and both do the job. My question is... if diesel is so much better then gas why do so many diesel owners chip their engines? Even yours must have been lacking that you had to chip it. Sure don't see it as much on the gas side.
7% slopes? Why not a real hill? With my gas engine a 7% is nothing. I do 18 % and there are some who tow hills even steeper and we haven't chipped our engines an extra xxhp and xxx torque.
* This post was
edited 01/11/13 03:59pm by DSteiner51 *
D. Steiner
The sooner I fall behind, the more time I have to catch up.
|
ClusterOfAtoms

USA

New Member

Joined: 04/12/2011

View Profile

Offline
|
I have a 2008 Toyota Tundra and a 2012 Dodge 3500. I tow a 27ft toy hauler that weighs 11.5k and tow 470 miles round trip from Scottsdale to Glamis CA 2-3 weekends a month in the winter.
I tow 75-77mph and get 6mpg with my Tundra and at the same speed with my Cummins I get 9mpg. But the Dodge is still new, so that will probably go up a little in the next 5k miles or so. Anyway, thats my .02. I have 3.73's in my Dodge and 4.3's in my Tundra
|
rhagfo

Portland, OR

Senior Member

Joined: 07/06/2012

View Profile


Good Sam RV Club Member
Offline
|
DSteiner51 wrote: rhagfo wrote:
Dang you two, just accept that year for year a Diesel will out tow a gasser!
I would put each of the big threes, diesels up against their gas engines, no match!
I pull a 11K fiver up 7% grades, and can accelerate to the 55 mph speed limit while doing so, only addition to my 01, is a simple Power Puck 50 hp and about 150 ft. lb. of torque, running 3.55 gears.
If it was gas with those gears it would be doing 35 mph at the top of the hill! I hate to think what it would do with 4.10's!!!
I've run both gas and diesel and both do the job. My question is... if diesel is so much better then gas why do so many diesel owners chip their engines? Even yours must have been lacking that you had to chip it. Sure don't see it as much on the gas side.
7% slopes? Why not a real hill? With my gas engine a 7% is nothing. I do 18 % and there are some who tow hills even steeper and we haven't chipped our engines an extra xxhp and xxx torque.
Just where do you find an 18% grade in Ohio?
Russ & Paula the Beagle Belle.
2016 Ram Laramie 3500 Aisin DRW 4X4 Long bed.
2005 Copper Canyon 293 FWSLS, 32' GVWR 12,360#
"Visit and Enjoy Oregon State Parks"
|
mimalmo

Western Wisconsin

Full Member

Joined: 09/15/2012

View Profile

|
rhagfo wrote:
Just where do you find an 18% grade in Ohio?
I'm sure there are some. Many areas in the Midwest have steep grades. The difference between the Midwest and the mountains is that the steep Midwest grades are shorter in distance.
|
DSteiner51

Wooster, Oh

Senior Member

Joined: 01/30/2004

View Profile


Good Sam RV Club Member
|
Contrary to what lots of folks think Ohio is not as flat as a sheet of plywood. Within 8 miles and between my house and favorite camping spot is 18%. I've been on roads with steeper hills in Ohio then any other state including the rocky mountains. They just aren't as long. I've been on steeper hills with my rig but didn't measure the slope so I use the 18% figure to be safe.
Back to Diesel v Gas my question still stands, if diesel is so much better then gas why do so many diesel owners chip their engines?
* This post was
edited 01/12/13 04:56am by DSteiner51 *
|
|
Paul Clancy

BC Canada

Senior Member

Joined: 09/16/2005

View Profile


Good Sam RV Club Member
|
Simple answer - because they can and not all do. When a cheap box promises 100-200hp and better mileage the temptation is too great for some. Many gas truck owners chip them with far smaller gains. I have not and will not use a tuner. I also prefer the no stink or noise of the stock exhaust - some use a tuner to eliminate the emissions. As stock 365/685 is more than enough for my needs.
|
Leroy2u

Texas

Full Member

Joined: 05/20/2011

View Profile


Good Sam RV Club Member
Offline
|
I find that chipping diesel motors today is not as common as people think. I know dozens of guys that have diesels and maybe 3-4 have theirs chipped. It would be interesting if there was poll on RV-net that people would respond to honestly indicating the true numbers that are chipped.
2012 Silverado 3500 DRW
2013 XLR 395 AMP
|
rhagfo

Portland, OR

Senior Member

Joined: 07/06/2012

View Profile


Good Sam RV Club Member
Offline
|
Leroy2u wrote: I find that chipping diesel motors today is not as common as people think. I know dozens of guys that have diesels and maybe 3-4 have theirs chipped. It would be interesting if there was poll on RV-net that people would respond to honestly indicating the true numbers that are chipped.
Well I chipped mine to "Wake it up" early electronic diesels very conservatively tuned out of the factory. Factory setup on my 01 Cummins was 235 HP and 460 ft. lbs. of torque, I installed about the smallest chip available. It claimed 50 hp and 150 ft. lbs., which it delivered most, so now I have about 285 HP and maybe 600 ft. lbs. of torque, and get 20 mpg HW, 12 towing 11,000# and about 14 - 15 in town. I would not chip a new diesel.
|
bkirkpatrick

Brea / Orange County, CA

Senior Member

Joined: 01/03/2004

View Profile

Offline
|
Leroy2u wrote: I find that chipping diesel motors today is not as common as people think. I know dozens of guys that have diesels and maybe 3-4 have theirs chipped. It would be interesting if there was poll on RV-net that people would respond to honestly indicating the true numbers that are chipped.
Good point. You also have to take into consideration the new laws and monitoring (electronic) systems on new diesels. With my 99 7.3, in addition to the air filter, tuner, gauges, etc., I had a bigger downpipe and a straight 4" exhaust all the way back. Don't know if you could even do that with the newer diesels.
Raptor - Modifications
|
mimalmo

Western Wisconsin

Full Member

Joined: 09/15/2012

View Profile

|
DSteiner51 wrote:
Back to Diesel v Gas my question still stands, if diesel is so much better then gas why do so many diesel owners chip their engines?
Because they can. If you could add a nice hp and tq gain for just a few hundred dollars and it only took a few minutes to install, you'd do the same.
I love my big-block gasser but it would be a much better truck with a diesel powerplant.
|
|