Taco

VA

Senior Member

Joined: 11/17/2002

View Profile

Offline
|
I have stepped back from this for a while, but will address a few things.
Any measured test between gas and diesel trucks has shown them very very close in hill climbing performance. the diesel get better mileage and lower rpms but the speed is very very close and directly related to horsepower.
The diesel folks on here continue to argue their own beliefs with nothing to back them up other than they don't believe a gas truck can tow as well.
Some have said we should just all get along and all the discussion is pointless gas guys like gas trucks and diesel guys like diesel trucks.
The reason this discussion is important is that on a very very very regular basis people come to this forum looking for credible advice on what will suit their needs. This is almost always quickly responded to buy you need a diesel to tow a 8k travel trailer. It simply isn't true. If I would have bought a diesel instead of a gas truck it would have cost me 14-15k more over the gas truck. I would probably get about 7k back in fuel savings and maybe 3k more when I go to sell it. but would still be down 4-5k over my time of ownership.
|
transamz9

Lawrenceburg Ky

Senior Member

Joined: 07/27/2010

View Profile

Offline
|
Taco wrote: I have stepped back from this for a while, but will address a few things.
Any measured test between gas and diesel trucks has shown them very very close in hill climbing performance. the diesel get better mileage and lower rpms but the speed is very very close and directly related to horsepower.
The diesel folks on here continue to argue their own beliefs with nothing to back them up other than they don't believe a gas truck can tow as well.
Some have said we should just all get along and all the discussion is pointless gas guys like gas trucks and diesel guys like diesel trucks.
The reason this discussion is important is that on a very very very regular basis people come to this forum looking for credible advice on what will suit their needs. This is almost always quickly responded to buy you need a diesel to tow a 8k travel trailer. It simply isn't true. If I would have bought a diesel instead of a gas truck it would have cost me 14-15k more over the gas truck. I would probably get about 7k back in fuel savings and maybe 3k more when I go to sell it. but would still be down 4-5k over my time of ownership.
I call BS on that. There is only 7-8,000 difference in two trucks that have the same options except the motors. Maybe half ton to three quarter ton there is that much but not two like trucks.
No body yet has proved to me that diesel cost you more than gas in the long run.
2016 Ram 3500 Mega Cab Limited/2013 Ram 3500 SRW Cummins(sold)/2005 RAM 2500 Cummins/2011 Sandpiper 345 RET (sold) 2015 Sanibel 3601/2008 Nitro Z9 Mercury 250 PRO XS the best motor made.
|
OhhWell

Florida

Senior Member

Joined: 06/27/2011

View Profile


Good Sam RV Club Member
Offline
|
Taco wrote: I have stepped back from this for a while, but will address a few things.
Any measured test between gas and diesel trucks has shown them very very close in hill climbing performance. the diesel get better mileage and lower rpms but the speed is very very close and directly related to horsepower.
The diesel folks on here continue to argue their own beliefs with nothing to back them up other than they don't believe a gas truck can tow as well.
Some have said we should just all get along and all the discussion is pointless gas guys like gas trucks and diesel guys like diesel trucks.
The reason this discussion is important is that on a very very very regular basis people come to this forum looking for credible advice on what will suit their needs. This is almost always quickly responded to buy you need a diesel to tow a 8k travel trailer. It simply isn't true. If I would have bought a diesel instead of a gas truck it would have cost me 14-15k more over the gas truck. I would probably get about 7k back in fuel savings and maybe 3k more when I go to sell it. but would still be down 4-5k over my time of ownership.
Stop trying to talk all reasonable about silly things like engine power (horsepower) and all that. When people are thinking with the "seat of their pants" you know which body part is invloved.
1998 bounder 36s V10 F53
|
transamz9

Lawrenceburg Ky

Senior Member

Joined: 07/27/2010

View Profile

Offline
|
With all these engineers that we have on here. Explain to me why torque is even a measurement that is used if it's not important. If it wasn't important, why even measure it?
|
OhhWell

Florida

Senior Member

Joined: 06/27/2011

View Profile


Good Sam RV Club Member
Offline
|
transamz9 wrote: Taco wrote: I have stepped back from this for a while, but will address a few things.
Any measured test between gas and diesel trucks has shown them very very close in hill climbing performance. the diesel get better mileage and lower rpms but the speed is very very close and directly related to horsepower.
The diesel folks on here continue to argue their own beliefs with nothing to back them up other than they don't believe a gas truck can tow as well.
Some have said we should just all get along and all the discussion is pointless gas guys like gas trucks and diesel guys like diesel trucks.
The reason this discussion is important is that on a very very very regular basis people come to this forum looking for credible advice on what will suit their needs. This is almost always quickly responded to buy you need a diesel to tow a 8k travel trailer. It simply isn't true. If I would have bought a diesel instead of a gas truck it would have cost me 14-15k more over the gas truck. I would probably get about 7k back in fuel savings and maybe 3k more when I go to sell it. but would still be down 4-5k over my time of ownership.
I call BS on that. There is only 7-8,000 difference in two trucks that have the same options except the motors. Maybe half ton to three quarter ton there is that much but not two like trucks.
No body yet has proved to me that diesel cost you more than gas in the long run.
He said that it would have cost HIM that much more so maybe he would have had to move up to a 2500 class truck to get a diesel engine.
why should anyone have to prove anything to you about the cost of ownership? diesel is a great choice for the long run. didn't you already know that since you have a diesel? I know that my Gasser is a great choice for my light 9k lbs trailer that I tow a few times a year in Florida. much better choice than a diesel for me.
|
|
OhhWell

Florida

Senior Member

Joined: 06/27/2011

View Profile


Good Sam RV Club Member
Offline
|
transamz9 wrote: With all these engineers that we have on here. Explain to me why torque is even a measurement that is used if it's not important. If it wasn't important, why even measure it?
that's been explained over and over again. maybe go back and read through a couple times until it sinks in?
|
Taco

VA

Senior Member

Joined: 11/17/2002

View Profile

Offline
|
transamz9 wrote:
I call BS on that. There is only 7-8,000 difference in two trucks that have the same options except the motors. Maybe half ton to three quarter ton there is that much but not two like trucks.
No body yet has proved to me that diesel cost you more than gas in the long run.
Please don't talk about what you know nothing about. you don't live in VA. Remember I said for ME it would cost that much. the diesel engine weight would push it over the gvw that get reduced personal property tax rates for "passenger vehicles" I would end up paying 4-5k more in personal property tax over my ownership.
then add 8k for the engine cost 1k finance cost of engine, 500 for def, 300 sales tax on engine option. then the slightly higher routine maint costs.
This doesn't even touch the fact that a diesel is much more costly to fix outside of warranty, which is also a major factor in my decision.
|
OhhWell

Florida

Senior Member

Joined: 06/27/2011

View Profile


Good Sam RV Club Member
Offline
|
Taco wrote: transamz9 wrote:
I call BS on that. There is only 7-8,000 difference in two trucks that have the same options except the motors. Maybe half ton to three quarter ton there is that much but not two like trucks.
No body yet has proved to me that diesel cost you more than gas in the long run.
Please don't talk about what you know nothing about. you don't live in VA. Remember I said for ME it would cost that much. the diesel engine weight would push it over the gvw that get reduced personal property tax rates for "passenger vehicles" I would end up paying 4-5k more in personal property tax over my ownership.
then add 8k for the engine cost 1k finance cost of engine, 500 for def, 300 sales tax on engine option. then the slightly higher routine maint costs.
This doesn't even touch the fact that a diesel is much more costly to fix outside of warranty, which is also a major factor in my decision.
Looks like he got you there. For HIM it would cost that much more. he has specific reasons that make sense.
|
transamz9

Lawrenceburg Ky

Senior Member

Joined: 07/27/2010

View Profile

Offline
|
I'm not trying to be a pain in the *** but I am like you trying to get as much of the info on this thread correct. First off Taco I'm sorry, I didn't catch the "I" in the post where you said that it would cost "you" 14-15G more. I'm sorry for that. So you bought a half ton instead of a three quarter?
As far as routine maintenance cost go, yes if you buy a Ford diesel because they have to until they get the bugs worked out. The others, I don't think so.
OhhWell, I know that torque is stationary but here's my theory. You guys have already said that a diesel will get up to speed quicker with a load because of the low end torque. If you think about it , it makes sense if you have 600 lb/ft of pressure trying to turn a wheel as apposed 300 lb/ft of pressure trying to turn a wheel. Same as true if you are already running a set speed (flat ground) and you start up a 6% grade. It's going to be harder to slow a wheel's speed down that has 600 lb/ft then it will 300 lb/ft.
Am I thinking correctly?
|
OhhWell

Florida

Senior Member

Joined: 06/27/2011

View Profile


Good Sam RV Club Member
Offline
|
transamz9 wrote: I'm not trying to be a pain in the *** but I am like you trying to get as much of the info on this thread correct. First off Taco I'm sorry, I didn't catch the "I" in the post where you said that it would cost "you" 14-15G more. I'm sorry for that. So you bought a half ton instead of a three quarter?
As far as routine maintenance cost go, yes if you buy a Ford diesel because they have to until they get the bugs worked out. The others, I don't think so.
OhhWell, I know that torque is stationary but here's my theory. You guys have already said that a diesel will get up to speed quicker with a load because of the low end torque. If you think about it , it makes sense if you have 600 lb/ft of pressure trying to turn a wheel as apposed 300 lb/ft of pressure trying to turn a wheel. Same as true if you are already running a set speed (flat ground) and you start up a 6% grade. It's going to be harder to slow a wheel's speed down that has 600 lb/ft then it will 300 lb/ft.
Am I thinking correctly?
Yeah, that would make sense I think. it would take a pretty long hill with no switchbacks for an engine with higher HP and lower torque to start pulling ahead of an engine with lower HP and higher torque.
|
|