Open Roads Forum

Print  |  Close

Topic: Tongue weight issue on new toy hauler

Posted By: Spyingeye on 06/19/19 08:37pm

Hi all, new to forums, first post. Just recently picked up a 2019 Wildwood FSX 280RT. Purchased the weight distribution hitch and had all installed from dealer. I am towing the unit with a 3/4 pickup. When I towed the unit home dry I had no problems however that all changed once I loaded the toy into the back. I have a Can am Maverick X3 with a dry weight of roughly 1700 lbs. Once I hit the highway around 55 mph and attempted a lane change, the unit swayed terribly causing me to cross all 3 lanes and almost lose it. I took the trailer and truck to a cat scale and got 3 weights. Truck, truck and trailer dry and truck and loaded trailer. I then took the unit to have it looked at by a local individual who advised the tongue weight was way under what it needed to be. The problem we found was that the toy hauler garage is 136” and the rear axle sits at 127”. This means that when you put a toy in the garage, nearly all the weight falls behind the rear axle removing a good portion of tongue weight. With all the info I contacted Forest River who came and picked up the unit and took it back to Indiana for testing. That is currently where we stand. I will say that Forest River has been quick and in constant communication throughout this process. My question is, has anyone ever experienced anything like this and what can I expect?


Posted By: Flute Man on 06/19/19 09:22pm

You have to find a way to load the front of the trailer.


Jerry Parr
05 Mandalay 40B
Cat C7 350
04 Honda CR-V
Ham Radio K7OU
Retired EE
[email protected]
602-321-8141
Full-timer


Posted By: Rover_Bill on 06/19/19 10:31pm

Fill up the fresh water tank and your propane tanks. That should add about 400# to the tongue weight. A portable generator stored in the front storage area will add another 50#.


2015 GMC Canyon 3.6L V6 4X4 TowHaul SLE ExtCab Bronze
2016 Keystone Passport GT 2670BH
ReCurve R6 hitch, DirecLink brake controller
2005 Suzuki C50 2006 Suzuki S40


Posted By: twodownzero on 06/19/19 10:32pm

Flute Man wrote:

You have to find a way to load the front of the trailer.


Yep. As heavy as you can get it in the front. As long as you have enough truck, you will never regret more tongue weight (within reason).


Posted By: 1320Fastback on 06/19/19 11:32pm

I'd say fill the fresh tank, propane bottles and batteries but am scared of the thought of coming back home with empty tanks and half filled propane.


1992 D250 Cummins 5psd
2005 Forest River T26 Toy Hauler



Posted By: garysol on 06/20/19 05:39am

I will say that so far I am impressed that Forest River seems to be taking this so seriously. The Maverick is rear engined right? Are you loading it in backwards or forward facing? It could make a huge difference.


2020 GMC Canyon
2022 NoBo 19.2


Posted By: eHoefler on 06/20/19 06:17am

Load your SXS backwards, the rear engine will be tail heavy.


2021 Ram Limited, 3500, Crew Cab, 1075FTPD of Torque!, Max Tow, Long bed, 4 x 4, Dually,
2006 40' Landmark Mt. Rushmore


Posted By: boogie_4wheel on 06/20/19 06:55am

3rd poster agreeing that you should back the toy into the trailer to get the majority of the weight to the front.


2005 2500 Cummins/48RE/3.73, QCLB, 4wd, BigHorn, Edge Juice w/ CTS + Turbo Timer,Transgo Shift Kit ISSPro Oil and LP pressure gauges, GDP 20/2 filters, Custom Diesel Steering Box Brace
'10 Forest River Shockwave Toy Hauler 21'
Honda EU3000I Genny


Posted By: valhalla360 on 06/20/19 07:17am

What is the load capacity of the toy hauler and as mentioned, front or rear facing when loaded.

Most toy haulers have a high tongue weight when unloaded, so that when loaded, it's still a decent amount.

What are the weights you measured?


Tammy & Mike
Ford F250 V10
2021 Gray Wolf
Gemini Catamaran 34'
Full Time spliting time between boat and RV



Posted By: nayther on 06/20/19 08:03am

If FR has the unit then it's pretty serious. Sounds like axles are too far forward. Of course adding water, etc. to the front will help but why should you have to do that? Proper engineering is needed


DIRT BIKES RULE

'12 Duramax CC short bed
2019 Wildcat Maxx 285RKX


Posted By: newman fulltimer on 06/20/19 08:17am

Surprised nobody said this ......put a better quality tire on the trailer will get rid of a lot of the sway


Posted By: Spyingeye on 06/20/19 10:03am

So the dry weight of the hauler is 5900 lbs. the CCC is 2200 lbs. I tried backing in the X3 and filing the freshwater. It’s only a 30 gallon tank, in the center of RV, so it added roughly 240 lbs. Problem is, once it’s loaded with x3, full tank and misc camping gear we come close to exceeding the GVWR. I even took 200 pounds of dumbbells that I had in my house and put them in the front pass through. Here are the weight measurements from the cat scale.

Truck only (2017 Ram 2500)
- steer axle - 4040 lb
- drive axle - 3080 lb
- gross weight - 7120 lb

Truck and dry trailer
-steer axle - 3760 lb
- drive axle - 4400 lb
- trailer axle - 4860 lb
- gross weight - 13020 lb

Truck and loaded trailer
- steer axle - 3940 lb
- drive axle - 3840 lb
- trailer axle - 7240 lb
- gross weight 15020 lb

This weight was with the X3 backed in. Based on my calculations, which may or may not be accurate, it appears the dry tongue weight is roughly 17%. When loaded, the tongue weight drops below 9%. My thoughts are that the axle placement is way too far forward on a unit that only weighs 5900 pounds and offers a CCC of 2200 pounds, especially if the majority of that weight is in the garage.

* This post was edited 06/20/19 10:12am by Spyingeye *


Posted By: the bear II on 06/20/19 10:17am

eHoefler wrote:

Load your SXS backwards, the rear engine will be tail heavy.


X-2


Posted By: valhalla360 on 06/20/19 02:43pm

Is the weight distributing hitch installed correctly?

You are losing a good bit of weight off the front axle in the unloaded condition.

But yeah, the hitch weight seems really light when loaded.


Posted By: colliehauler on 06/20/19 03:42pm

Spyingeye wrote:

So the dry weight of the hauler is 5900 lbs. the CCC is 2200 lbs. I tried backing in the X3 and filing the freshwater. It’s only a 30 gallon tank, in the center of RV, so it added roughly 240 lbs. Problem is, once it’s loaded with x3, full tank and misc camping gear we come close to exceeding the GVWR. I even took 200 pounds of dumbbells that I had in my house and put them in the front pass through. Here are the weight measurements from the cat scale.

Truck only (2017 Ram 2500)
- steer axle - 4040 lb
- drive axle - 3080 lb
- gross weight - 7120 lb

Truck and dry trailer
-steer axle - 3760 lb
- drive axle - 4400 lb
- trailer axle - 4860 lb
- gross weight - 13020 lb

Truck and loaded trailer
- steer axle - 3940 lb
- drive axle - 3840 lb
- trailer axle - 7240 lb
- gross weight 15020 lb

This weight was with the X3 backed in. Based on my calculations, which may or may not be accurate, it appears the dry tongue weight is roughly 17%. When loaded, the tongue weight drops below 9%. My thoughts are that the axle placement is way too far forward on a unit that only weighs 5900 pounds and offers a CCC of 2200 pounds, especially if the majority of that weight is in the garage.
I would say your spot on with the axle to far forward. I bet that was one wild ride with the sway.


Posted By: lincster on 06/20/19 08:59pm

Forest river has had this issue for years.
I agree about axle placement.


2019 F350 PSD CC 4X4 Dually to pull 2006 LE3905

Lincsters Truck/Trailer

Lincsters Rail


Posted By: Rover_Bill on 06/20/19 09:21pm

Spyingeye wrote:


Truck only (2017 Ram 2500)
- steer axle - 4040 lb
- drive axle - 3080 lb

Truck and loaded trailer
- steer axle - 3940 lb
- drive axle - 3840 lb


IMHO, your WDH is not yet properly setup. You need to move 150-200# from your drive axle to the steering axle. The steering axle should NEVER lose weight when the loaded trailer is attached.


Posted By: rhagfo on 06/20/19 10:05pm

nayther wrote:

If FR has the unit then it's pretty serious. Sounds like axles are too far forward. Of course adding water, etc. to the front will help but why should you have to do that? Proper engineering is needed


Will never understand, why TH don't have axles placed like horse trailers. much closer to the rear.

This would solve the issue with being tail heavy, but could be an issue for tongue weight.
The 30' 4 horse with small living quarters trailer had about the same 2,700# pin EMPTY as our 32' 5er fully loaded at 12,500#.

[image]


Russ & Paula the Beagle Belle.
2016 Ram Laramie 3500 Aisin DRW 4X4 Long bed.
2005 Copper Canyon 293 FWSLS, 32' GVWR 12,360#

"Visit and Enjoy Oregon State Parks"



Posted By: twodownzero on 06/20/19 10:12pm

rhagfo wrote:

nayther wrote:

If FR has the unit then it's pretty serious. Sounds like axles are too far forward. Of course adding water, etc. to the front will help but why should you have to do that? Proper engineering is needed


Will never understand, why TH don't have axles placed like horse trailers. much closer to the rear.

This would solve the issue with being tail heavy, but could be an issue for tongue weight.
The 30' 4 horse with small living quarters trailer had about the same 2,700# pin EMPTY as our 32' 5er fully loaded at 12,500#.

[image]


If that's true, the truck in the picture is massively overloaded. It has 2000 pounds of payload at most. And if so, you answered your own question--to keep from massively overloading 3/4 ton trucks.


Posted By: eHoefler on 06/21/19 05:46am

Rover_Bill wrote:

Spyingeye wrote:


Truck only (2017 Ram 2500)
- steer axle - 4040 lb
- drive axle - 3080 lb

Truck and loaded trailer
- steer axle - 3940 lb
- drive axle - 3840 lb


IMHO, your WDH is not yet properly setup. You need to move 150-200# from your drive axle to the steering axle. The steering axle should NEVER lose weight when the loaded trailer is attached.


Steer axle is loosing too much weight, need to redo the setup for the equalizer to compensate for the loaded trailer. What works empty won't work for it loaded.


Posted By: rhagfo on 06/21/19 06:20am

twodownzero wrote:

rhagfo wrote:

nayther wrote:

If FR has the unit then it's pretty serious. Sounds like axles are too far forward. Of course adding water, etc. to the front will help but why should you have to do that? Proper engineering is needed


Will never understand, why TH don't have axles placed like horse trailers. much closer to the rear.

This would solve the issue with being tail heavy, but could be an issue for tongue weight.
The 30' 4 horse with small living quarters trailer had about the same 2,700# pin EMPTY as our 32' 5er fully loaded at 12,500#.

[image]


If that's true, the truck in the picture is massively overloaded. It has 2000 pounds of payload at most. And if so, you answered your own question--to keep from massively overloading 3/4 ton trucks.


Yep, it sure was, or is it? the only thing supporting the trailer is the jacks under the axles so we can get the tires replaced, AND the rear axle of the TV. TV had camper package and optional 265/75-16E tires.
Dodge was very lazy in those years only GVWR on the 2500 was 8,800#, manual trans and Camper package put the same springs as the 3500 DRW (NO SRW 3500 1994 to 2002), I think Dodge could have bumped up closer to 10,000# due to the heaver springs. I will state no Air Bags or other support devices installed.
It is DD's trailer, dad convinced her to get a 2004 Dodge 3500 DRW to haul it with, combo does great.
As for Dad, we also got a 2016 Ram 3500 DRW, as getting a newer 3500 SRW would be a lateral move even with a 12,300# GVWR. Both pulled and handled great.


Posted By: colliehauler on 06/21/19 06:24am

lincster wrote:

Forest river has had this issue for years.
I agree about axle placement.
Did not know this. I own 2 Forest River TH TT and never had a issue. Usually loaded with motorcycles the heaviest thing was a jet ski and trailer.


Posted By: valhalla360 on 06/21/19 06:35am

rhagfo wrote:

nayther wrote:

If FR has the unit then it's pretty serious. Sounds like axles are too far forward. Of course adding water, etc. to the front will help but why should you have to do that? Proper engineering is needed


Will never understand, why TH don't have axles placed like horse trailers. much closer to the rear.

This would solve the issue with being tail heavy, but could be an issue for tongue weight.
The 30' 4 horse with small living quarters trailer had about the same 2,700# pin EMPTY as our 32' 5er fully loaded at 12,500#.


5th wheels typically run 20-25% pin weight...this results in needing at least a 3/4 ton and often a 1 ton for all but the smallest 5th wheels.

A bumper pull typically runs 10-15% hitch weight. This allows moderate size trailers to be pulled with 1/2 ton trucks. If they pushed the wheels back to increase the hitch weight, people with 1/2 ton trucks would rule out their trailers...which means reduced sales because 1/2 ton trucks are drastically more popular than 3/4 & 1 ton trucks.

Of course, the downside of this compromise is hitch weight will vary substantially depending on loaded or unloaded. In a reverse of typical conditions, a truck pushing the limits may be overloaded (hitch weight) when the toy hauler is running lite with no toys.

I would be very curious to find out what the manufacture actually finds in this situation.
- Did someone mess up when calculating the weight distribution?
- Did the OP have other cargo not mentioned that threw off the weight distribution?
- Was the WDH set up correctly?
- Was there something else we can't see given the limited information provided?


Posted By: Spyingeye on 06/26/19 12:19pm

Bit of an update. I talked to them today and they said they contemplated moving the axle but realized that wasn’t going to fix the issue. Instead they added 125 lbs to the A frame on the trailer tongue. I don’t know how well this going to work but now deducts from my total GVW. They are going to bring it back to me to test out and we’ll go from there.


Posted By: colliehauler on 06/26/19 01:37pm

What they probably meant was it was a lot cheaper and quicker to add weight then to move the axles.

My opinion only that's BS about the axle move not fixing the problem.


Posted By: lincster on 06/27/19 07:58am

That is a 100% band aid fix.
Cheap for them.
Moving axles is not cheap for them.
Horrible service.


Posted By: nayther on 06/27/19 09:06am

lincster wrote:

That is a 100% band aid fix.
Cheap for them.
Moving axles is not cheap for them.
Horrible service.


yep, cheap and dirty and it does decrease your load carrying capacity. They need to redo your VIN sticker too. You now have a trailer with lesser capacity than you purchased. Not sure if that has any effect on how you intend to use the trailer.


Posted By: Spyingeye on 06/27/19 09:27am

nayther wrote:

lincster wrote:

That is a 100% band aid fix.
Cheap for them.
Moving axles is not cheap for them.
Horrible service.


yep, cheap and dirty and it does decrease your load carrying capacity. They need to redo your VIN sticker too. You now have a trailer with lesser capacity than you purchased. Not sure if that has any effect on how you intend to use the trailer.


Very valid point. I’ll have to mention that to them when they call me back.


Posted By: CincyGus on 06/27/19 01:06pm

No way I would settle for that solution. They are taking away weight from the cargo carrying total that you paid for. Your close already with a 1700 lb toy in a trailer with 2200 CCC. Are you really able stay below 500 lbs of other camping gear, food, water, clothes, etc? No way I could.

They need to fix the issue by moving the axle and I would be asking to have them increase the axle rating (put a bigger axle on it) as a solution if they feel they need to leave the added weight up front to at a minimum leave you the CCC you thought you were getting.

My two cents but don't settle for less that what you researched and paid for capability wise.


2015 GMC 2500 Denali Crewcab 4x4
2019 Forest River Wolfpack 23pack15

Hope your travels are safe and the friendships made camping are lasting.


Posted By: twodownzero on 06/27/19 07:32pm

rhagfo wrote:


Yep, it sure was, or is it? the only thing supporting the trailer is the jacks under the axles so we can get the tires replaced, AND the rear axle of the TV. TV had camper package and optional 265/75-16E tires.
Dodge was very lazy in those years only GVWR on the 2500 was 8,800#, manual trans and Camper package put the same springs as the 3500 DRW (NO SRW 3500 1994 to 2002), I think Dodge could have bumped up closer to 10,000# due to the heaver springs. I will state no Air Bags or other support devices installed.
It is DD's trailer, dad convinced her to get a 2004 Dodge 3500 DRW to haul it with, combo does great.
As for Dad, we also got a 2016 Ram 3500 DRW, as getting a newer 3500 SRW would be a lateral move even with a 12,300# GVWR. Both pulled and handled great.


Not just those years, GVWR stayed at 8800 for a while into the next generation. Seems you answered your question yourself--vehicle was 1000 pounds overloaded once passengers got in it with the empty trailer. Once trailer is loaded it only got worse from there. Glad your dad got a DRW. I'm on my last SRW myself, just too easy to overload the truck with pin weight.


Posted By: AlwaysOnTheRoad on 07/03/19 06:16am

What WDH are you using? I agree that adding front weight is not the real solution. I'll bet that future models of this trailer have the axles relocated.


2016 F150 4X4 2.7EcoBoost 6Speed 3:55's / 2019 Jayco Octane 222SL ToyHauler



Posted By: RoyBell on 07/11/19 12:27pm

Looking at a picture of the camper, the wheels look like they are in the center of the camper. Who designed this thing to be a toy hauler? If your's has the rear door behind the wheels that I See in the pictures, I don't see how they can move the axles back any further.


Posted By: Spyingeye on 07/11/19 04:57pm

Here’s a picture of the trailer and the WDH. The ruler represents the end of the garage space. As you can see the axles are at the very rear. As stated earlier, Forest River advised that they were going to move the axle but realized that was not an option. So instead they added 125 lbs to the tongue. I have heard from a few locals as well as a few of you on this forum who addressed concerns with the bandaid fix. I appreciate all the feedback. I don’t think I will be settling for this “fix”.

[image]

[image]

* This post was edited 07/11/19 05:18pm by an administrator/moderator *


Posted By: Spyingeye on 07/11/19 05:05pm

Also, once loaded you can see how low the back end is. This resulted in the following:

[image]

[image]

* This post was edited 07/11/19 05:18pm by an administrator/moderator *


Posted By: dedmiston on 07/11/19 05:20pm

Wow. How did the stabilizer jack tweak so badly?


2014 RAM 3500 Diesel 4x4 Dually long bed. AISIN trans & 4.10 rear. B&W RVK3600 hitch • 2015 Crossroads Elevation Homestead Toy Hauler ("The Taj Mahauler") • Hooligan #3

Toys:
  • 18 Can Am Maverick x3
  • 05 Yamaha WR450
  • 07 Honda CRF250X
  • 05 Honda CRF230
  • 06 Honda CRF230



Posted By: Spyingeye on 07/11/19 05:34pm

dedmiston wrote:

Wow. How did the stabilizer jack tweak so badly?


Only about 3-4” off the ground when loaded. Anytime the truck was on higher ground than the trailer the rear and would scrape. One slight dip in the road took the metal protectors and then moments later another dip took the jacks.


Posted By: HTElectrical on 07/12/19 06:03am

Your pictures leave a lot unanswered. It is clear that you are loosing weight on your steer axle, and need hitch adjustment or heavier spring bars, maybe both. Is the trailer level when loaded and hooked up? If it is and the rear is that low, you are going to have problems, and need to look into having your axles flipped, or I hate to say this should of bought a trailer that was better equipped/set up. I think that trailer is inadequate for that heavy of load and according to your figures you have already exceeded the GVWR.

  • UVW 5608 lb.
  • CCC 2152 lb
  • GVWR 7760 lb



2007 Duramax, Cognito 7"-9" Lift,



Posted By: Bedlam on 07/12/19 07:58am

When toy haulers were first introduced, a lot of companies jumped in to the craze by just modifying a travel trailer with a rear door. I thought these models were gone and frame specific toy hauler models were now the norm. It appears your model is based off a travel trailer frame which is why you have so much carrying any amount of weight in the back. I don't have any simple solutions for you, but this observation.

Extending the tongue length and adding weight to it could solve the problem. if you load the tongue up with two 30# propane bottles and four 6VDC golf kart batteries, that may be enough. Like suggested in another post, having them upgrade the axles, suspension and wheels to the next higher rating would negate the extra weight being carried from taking away cargo capacity. With the suspension swap can also come a lift so the tail does not drag.


Chevy Sonic 1.8-Honda Passport C70B-Host Mammoth 11.5-Interstate Car Carrier 20-Joyner SandViper 250-Kawasaki Concours ZG1000-Paros 8' flatbed-Pelican Decker DLX 8.75-Ram 5500 HD



Posted By: dedmiston on 07/12/19 01:22pm

Spyingeye wrote:

dedmiston wrote:

Wow. How did the stabilizer jack tweak so badly?


Only about 3-4” off the ground when loaded. Anytime the truck was on higher ground than the trailer the rear and would scrape. One slight dip in the road took the metal protectors and then moments later another dip took the jacks.


Yikes. That's a pretty blatant design flaw.

How long since you took delivery? This really sounds like a rare case for a buy-back.


Posted By: Spyingeye on 07/16/19 01:53pm

**Update**

I spoke with Pat Stratton with FR again today to check the status. Pat told me that my unit had been returned to the dealership on the 1st of July. I told him I was unaware of this and no one had called to let me know. I told him I was concerned about the weight issue now that they have added 150 lbs to the tongue and inquired about a buy back. His reply was “Sir unit was returned to dealership 7/1. As for trading we would assist 1500.00 towards but since unit did fall within proper percentage we only tried to accommodate.”

Note - the dry percentage was 17%, loaded was 9%. I don’t see how that falls within the proper percentage.

Since this email, I have called the dealership and asked about my RV to which they stated they don’t know anything about it being returned or it’s whereabouts. This gets better and better


Posted By: Bionic Man on 07/16/19 05:34pm

I know two people with FR products (Wildcat 5ers). Both had too light of pin weight - neither towed well.

Good luck with your resolution. Maybe it got lost in transit. ??


2012 RAM 3500 Laramie Longhorn DRW CC 4x4 Max Tow, Cummins HO, 60 gallon RDS aux fuel tank, Reese 18k Elite hitch
2003 Dodge Ram 3500 QC SB 4x4 Cummins HO NV5600 with Smarty JR, Jacobs EB (sold)
2002 Gulf Stream Sea Hawk 29FRB with Honda EV6010


Print  |  Close