![[image]](https://image.ibb.co/nh7nYn/FDE8_CCFD_1_C4_E_40_FF_BC1_C_0257_EAAFFA59.jpg)
Winnebago 2101DS TT & 2022 Chevy Silverado 1500 LTZ Z71, WindyNation 300 watt solar-Lossigy 200 AH Lithium battery. Prefer boondocking, USFS, COE, BLM, NPS, TVA, state camps. Bicyclist. 14 yr. Army -11B40 then 11A - (MOS 1542 & 1560) IOBC & IOAC grad
Just wait for weight police.
'10 Ford F-450, 6.4, 4.30, 4x4, 14,500 GVWR, '06 Host Rainer 950 DS, Torklift Talon tiedowns, Glow Steps, and Fastguns. Bilstein 4600s, Firestone Bags, Toyo M655 Gs, Curt front hitch, Energy Suspension bump stops.
NRA Life Member, CCA Life Member
Transit Cab Chassis
• Single Cab and Double Cab
• Seats up to 7 occupants (on Double Cab)
• 2.2L TDCi Diesel engine
• 114kW Power
• 385Nm Torque
• 4,490kg Gross Vehicle Mass
• 3,159 – 4,149mm Frame Length
• 2,227 – 2,390kg Max Payload
• 3,500kg Braked Towing Capacity#
so it has a payload capacity of 4899 pounds to 5258 pounds per ford. you need to stop throwing out BS information
2011 F350 6.7L Diesel 4x4 CrewCab longbed Dually, 2019 Lance 1062, Torqlift Talons, Fast Guns, upper and lower Stable Loads, Super Hitch, 48" Super Truss, Airlift loadlifter 5000 extreme airbags
2017 Ford Transit
EVO Electric bike
Advanced Elements Kayaks
Quote:
Par for the course for a European Cab Chassis. Renault has a 2 litre Cab Chassis variant of their Master Van, it has a 6000lb payload.
See the TFL truck story on the new Sprinter and the host mentions the Cab Chassis Mercedes gives a 5,500lb loading for the Older Sprinter
King of the.Cab Chassis is the IVECO with a 9000lb rating!
Cab Chassis are the European Pickups. You can get RWD, FWD or FOUR WHEEL Drive
Par for the course for a European Cab Chassis. Renault has a 2 litre Cab Chassis variant of their Master Van, it has a 6000lb payload.
See the TFL truck story on the new Sprinter and the host mentions the Cab Chassis Mercedes gives a 5,500lb loading for the Older Sprinter
King of the.Cab Chassis is the IVECO with a 9000lb rating!
Cab Chassis are the European Pickups. You can get RWD, FWD or FOUR WHEEL Drive
Editing on this forum has its problems My Reply too Buzzcut 1
* This post was edited 05/06/18 11:10pm by RobertRyan *
Photomike wrote:
Better yet just convert a van, many more benefits than going the other route Van Conversion
Better yet just convert a van, many more benefits than going the other route Van Conversion
They are not Cab Chassis
![[image]](https://image.ibb.co/fWpzg7/67_CA311_F_2_D53_48_E8_BAB7_E98_B90_C9_B6_B1.jpg)
delete account permanently
Land of Opportunity & Liberty 4 ALL!
The Transit is a capable truck and I see many of them every day. They are a decent base for our European class C variety. But an American TC belongs on a classic pickup truck.
Since the Bed is completely above the rear wheels, these things tend to be very tall.
Other than that I am sure it works well. And the Outfitter I owned went on to be carried on a Mercedes Sprinter 4x4. But still... something just doesn't look right to my eyes.
2014 Ford F350 XLT 6.2 SCLB + 2017 Northstar Arrow
joerg68 wrote:
this...just does not look right.
The Transit is a capable truck and I see many of them every day. They are a decent base for our European class C variety. But an American TC belongs on a classic pickup truck.
Since the Bed is completely above the rear wheels, these things tend to be very tall.
Other than that I am sure it works well. And the Outfitter I owned went on to be carried on a Mercedes Sprinter 4x4. But still... something just doesn't look right to my eyes.
this...just does not look right.
The Transit is a capable truck and I see many of them every day. They are a decent base for our European class C variety. But an American TC belongs on a classic pickup truck.
Since the Bed is completely above the rear wheels, these things tend to be very tall.
Other than that I am sure it works well. And the Outfitter I owned went on to be carried on a Mercedes Sprinter 4x4. But still... something just doesn't look right to my eyes.
Doubt it looks right for someone used too US Pickups carrying TC'c. they do work very well. Still non American TC owners have no poblem
bagman wrote:
I like the Class C above! Would be perfect for a couple. I say that because our 2 kids are fully grown, out of the house and our focus would be for a motorized RV with enough living space in a Class C. My wife doesn't like Class A's, with respect to driving them and driving makes me very tired, so we need an RV we both feel comfortable driving! Bags.
I like the Class C above! Would be perfect for a couple. I say that because our 2 kids are fully grown, out of the house and our focus would be for a motorized RV with enough living space in a Class C. My wife doesn't like Class A's, with respect to driving them and driving makes me very tired, so we need an RV we both feel comfortable driving! Bags.
The Class C version has a 15,400lb GVWR and a 23750lb GCVWR
RobertRyan wrote:
The Class C version has a 15,400lb GVWR and a 23750lb GCVWR
Interesting , 15400 GVWR is over 30 percent more than Ford rates that vehicle . Where is that number coming from ?
bagman wrote:
I like the Class C above! Would be perfect for a couple. I say that because our 2 kids are fully grown, out of the house and our focus would be for a motorized RV with enough living space in a Class C. My wife doesn't like Class A's, with respect to driving them and driving makes me very tired, so we need an RV we both feel comfortable driving! Bags.
I like the Class C above! Would be perfect for a couple. I say that because our 2 kids are fully grown, out of the house and our focus would be for a motorized RV with enough living space in a Class C. My wife doesn't like Class A's, with respect to driving them and driving makes me very tired, so we need an RV we both feel comfortable driving! Bags.
The Class C version has a 15,400lb GVWR and a 23750lb GCVWR
'68 Avion C-11
'02 GMC DRW D/A flatbed
Ticki2 wrote:
Interesting , 15400 GVWR is over 30 percent more than Ford rates that vehicle . Where is that number coming from ?
Interesting , 15400 GVWR is over 30 percent more than Ford rates that vehicle . Where is that number coming from ?
It has a greater GAWR the IVECO Daily 70C, than than the E450 which is the IVECO equivalent .Whole IVECO “Vans” lineup is fascinating
This is the 35C a less rugged version towing in Europe
![[image]](https://image.ibb.co/m7Q6B7/499_AFEB0_31_B2_44_CB_AC0_F_2_CF4_A85_BD479.jpg)
![[image]](https://preview.ibb.co/dsAHJn/D096_B966_78_BB_4_B2_C_96_F6_1_AF538_D59341.jpg)
* This post was edited 05/07/18 05:21am by RobertRyan *
Here is a Hotshot version, 3000km range and has a 6,600lb payload
![[image]](https://preview.ibb.co/g9zir7/1_F9_A429_A_C8_D6_410_D_8_A20_C8701_CD47_D41.jpg)
As a 4x4 Off Road vehicle 5000lb payload , 7,700lb towing
![[image]](https://image.ibb.co/cSzKyn/B9_DF9_E09_4261_456_A_BAB3_6_F99_F8_A613_FF.jpg)
If you want to move a boat
![[image]](https://image.ibb.co/nsDF4S/9_D788302_4561_4_A58_861_C_D57_D484518_FF.jpg)
* This post was last edited 05/07/18 06:28am by RobertRyan *
![[image]](https://preview.ibb.co/ichpyn/B27_FBB8_F_6_BBC_443_F_A6_B1_723460_C90849.jpg)
ppine wrote:
Van conservions are expensive and really cramped. These are much better rigs for longer trips.
Van conservions are expensive and really cramped. These are much better rigs for longer trips.
I actually prefer my van conversion for longer trips. I use it more than I did my truck camper and the class C as driving it is so easy. Less weight and all the luxuries of home.
So far I have about half invested in the van with the conversion and the price of a new van then if I would have gone with another truck camper. Still have the Class C for trips closer to home and when I am staying in one place for a long time.
2015 Backpack SS1500
1997 Ford 7.3 OBS 4x4 CC LB