Open Roads Forum

Print  |  Close

Topic: SRW traction versus a DRW

Posted By: donnie144 on 10/22/16 09:50am

I'm currently towing a solitude 383 with an F350 srw. After dumping about 5k into tires wheels and suspension I'm really wishing I would have bought a DRW. So the question right now when backing the trailer up hill an a gravel driveway I need the truck in 4 wheel drive. I'm looking at getting a medium duty truck along the sport truck lines. With the dual rear wheel have any of you noticed better traction while backing? Ultimately we are upgrading just trying to figure out if I need to regrade or pave the driveway. Any insight you can provide would be greatly appreciated


Posted By: Me Again on 10/22/16 10:03am

Duals, will have less traction under those conditions, as you have less weight per sq in of tire on the ground. Chris


2021 F150 2.7 Ecoboost - Summer Home 2017 Bighorn 3575el. Can Am Spyder RT-L Chrome, Kawasaki KRX1000. Retired and enjoying it! RIP DW 07-05-2021



Posted By: Cummins12V98 on 10/22/16 10:19am

Pretty simple throw it in 4 low. If front tire grabbing is a concern get the BD front axle disconnect.

With a load on in 2wd I would think the dually would have better traction. Nothing to back it up.


2015 RAM LongHorn 3500 Dually CrewCab 4X4 CUMMINS/AISIN RearAir 385HP/865TQ 4:10's
37,800# GCVWR "Towing Beast"

"HeavyWeight" B&W RVK3600

2016 MobileSuites 39TKSB3 highly "Elited" In the stable

2007.5 Mobile Suites 36 SB3 29,000# Combined SOLD


Posted By: 2oldman on 10/22/16 10:22am

donnie144 wrote:

I'm looking at getting a medium duty truck along the sport truck lines.
A sportchassis?

It's difficult to say but off the top of my head no, I don't think duals have better traction. The SC weighs more than a pickup, and more sq inches on the ground, but as previous poster said, less weight/area.

So.. I guess it's hard to say. I've never had my SC in such a situation.


Posted By: Cummins12V98 on 10/22/16 10:26am

OP not sure what your rig weighs but I tow 23K with 33K combined with no issues at all. I run full RAWR with factory rear air ride and truck sits just like it does without a load.


Posted By: Bedlam on 10/22/16 10:31am

You should look into a rear locker if set on a SC. I went with a Ram 5500 to keep 4WD yet get the 9k lb payload capacity I wanted. 4wd is available in other MD trucks, but it was at a cost I could not afford other than buying a Ford or Ram.


Chevy Sonic 1.8-Honda Passport C70B-Host Mammoth 11.5-Interstate Car Carrier 20-Joyner SandViper 250-Kawasaki Concours ZG1000-Paros 8' flatbed-Pelican Decker DLX 8.75-Ram 5500 HD



Posted By: larry barnhart on 10/22/16 10:35am

I made the mistake of going down a steep short gravel road at an rv park in Oregon. As I was full length in the gravel I saw it was the only road out of the lower level near the river. I knew we were in trouble but it was the only way I could back into the rv site because of all of the parked cars where I was supposed to pull into first . I had the 8.1 in that dually with the locker rear end and it just backed up without any issues. I was impressed as was the watchers that knew we were in trouble.

chevman


chevman
2019 rockwood 34 ft fifth wheel sold
2005 3500 2wd duramax CC dually
prodigy



KSH 55 inbed fuel tank

scanguage II
TD-EOC
Induction Overhaul Kit
TST tire monitors
FMCA # F479110


Posted By: jules6 on 10/22/16 10:38am

I owned a F450 cab chassis towing a 32 ' New Horizon and it would get stuck on wet grass.


Posted By: RoyB on 10/22/16 11:06am

I learned along time ago to use the truck brakes in conjunction with 4WD. Once one of the tires go to spinning mode you are out of luck. Applying a little foot pedal brakes solves this problem of spinning the wheels...

Roy Ken


Posted By: Ivylog on 10/22/16 11:11am

No, duals have less traction. My M2 Freightliner fortunately has a locking rear axle... electric switch on the dash. Have to use it often when off pavement... usually enough added traction.


This post is my opinion (free advice). It is not intended to influence anyone's judgment nor do I advocate anyone do what I propose.
Sold 04 Dynasty to our son after 14 great years.
Upgraded with a 08 HR Navigator 45’...



Posted By: 2oldman on 10/22/16 11:21am

Ivylog wrote:

My M2 Freightliner
You have that in addition to a MH?


Posted By: Chuck_thehammer on 10/22/16 01:13pm

traction, is the amount of weight sitting on the contact patch of tire to ground.. more tire = Less traction.

do you have a electronic Locking rear differential?, as an option on F 250,350 after 2010.


Posted By: burningman on 10/22/16 06:07pm

That's what 4WD is for! I don't see a problem here. ??


2017 Northern Lite 10-2 EX CD SE
99 Ram 4x4 Dually Cummins
A whole lot more fuel, a whole lot more boost.
4.10 gears, Gear Vendors overdrive, exhaust brake
Built auto, triple disc, billet shafts.
Kelderman Air Ride, Helwig sway bar.



Posted By: Ivylog on 10/22/16 06:52pm

Not many MDT with 4X4. Yes, I have a M2 plus a Airstream. I use the M2 in my work and my kids use it to pull their 5ers.
[image]

* This post was edited 10/24/16 11:16am by Ivylog *


Posted By: time2roll on 10/22/16 07:03pm

As long as you are in 4wd use 4LO for best results.

Is this a weight issue that you want a bigger truck?
Consider Eaton Truetrac differentials and lower gears if needed.


2001 F150 SuperCrew
2006 Keystone Springdale 249FWBHLS
675w Solar pictures back up


Posted By: donnie144 on 10/22/16 08:11pm

Thank you for all of the replies my current truck 2013 f350 srw with locker and 4x4. Not a problem at all as many said just dip it into 4x. But when going down hill if at all over 60 the trailer will push the rear end of the truck back and forth. I'm currently running vision heavy hauler wheels with Toyo m110. This truck also seems to need to go to the shop ever 6 months for some electrical or fuel related issue. Looking to upgrade to a bigger rig when warranty is over. If I'm buying again might as well get back into weight limits. Right now the scale has the truck with 7,800 lbs on the rear axle. Correct sportchassis or similiar for the money I'm thinking I want out of the big 3 and go with the heavier rigs of freightliner, international, kenworth or similar 26,000 gvw rig.


Posted By: blofgren on 10/22/16 08:54pm

Go for a 2013 or newer Ram 3500 4x4 DRW with the 6.7L Cummins, Aisin transmission, and 4.10 rear end and put an end to your reliability and overloaded problems.


2013 Ram 3500 Megacab DRW Laramie 4x4, 6.7L Cummins, G56, 3.73, Maximum Steel, black lthr, B&W RVK3670 hitch, Retrax, Linex, and a bunch of options incl. cargo camera
2008 Corsair Excella Platinum 34.5 CKTS fifth wheel with winter package & disc brakes


Posted By: Bedlam on 10/22/16 11:41pm

The OP wants a 26K lb GVWR MDT and you are offering him a 14K lb LDT? That would be like offering you a Dakota instead of your DRW 3500...


Posted By: donnie144 on 10/23/16 06:29am

Correction on the tire its a toyo M608z. And thank you Bedlam


Posted By: blt2ski on 10/23/16 06:51am

One thing that the larger MDT's have vs LDT's and the smaller MDT;s, is better gearing in transmissions, along with 2 spd rear ends. These will allow one at times NOT to need 4wd to move a load backwards or forwards up hills.
MY Navistar for example, has the ability to move 30K up a 30% grade. My old dually dmax it was 20K up a 24% grade. UNLESS I was in 4 lo. This is with a 175/335 non turbo 7.3 vs a 320/660 turbo 6.6L. Gears can make a difference in little trucks too. My old 96 6.5td with a manual 5 sp, 4.10 gears and a NV4500 manual, could do 30% grade at 20K lbs. Better than the dmax! BUT, the dmax due to 300+hp, could out pull both trucks on a typical 3-4% freeway grade speed wise.
Another thing MDT's offer if you do a lot of slower steeper grade towing and moving, is 2 speed rear ends. You can have a 3.73 road drive gears, and 4.10 or 4.33 gears for low speed/steep grade maneuvering.
Since we are talking low speed maneuvering...yes, mdt's are generally speaking, setup better! or at least have the ability to do so.
As far as DW vs SW traction.....SW's do better than duals. This included in semi's super singles vs two dual tires with the same width contact patch. so a single 20" wide tire vs two 10" tires of the same/similar tread designs.
Also as noted, if you get a mdt, make sure it has a locker of some sort. I have a detroit no spin/locker. An air on/off style would be nicer, but I have hydraulic brakes. An air locker is not in my cards. The locker helps in low traction situations. As they have in my LDT trucks trucks too. I've got places in RWD with a locker that took 4wd with an open rear diff. With this in mind too....sometimes one does need a front driving axle to get thru a low traction situation....lockers alone do not help..this is a pretty small % of time.
My 02 on the subject.

Marty


92 Navistar dump truck, 7.3L 7 sp, 4.33 gears with a Detroit no spin
2014 Chevy 1500 Dual cab 4x4
92 Red-e-haul 12K equipment trailer


Posted By: 2oldman on 10/23/16 07:44am

Ivylog wrote:

Yes, I have a M2 plus a Airstream.
Congratulations!


Posted By: Cummins12V98 on 10/23/16 10:24am

Bedlam wrote:

The OP wants a 26K lb GVWR MDT and you are offering him a 14K lb LDT? That would be like offering you a Dakota instead of your DRW 3500...


Some "THINK" they need a MDT so what's wrong with giving people options?

On another thread a guy was leaning Ford and I suggested looking at the RAM's also. He bought a RAM and publicly thanked me.


Posted By: bfast54 on 10/23/16 10:37am

Me Again wrote:

Duals, will have less traction under those conditions, as you have less weight per sq in of tire on the ground. Chris



Nice thought
But---- not alwasys.

2 tires-- have Less ground contact - per sq inch-- than 4 tires.

All things being equal--- 4 tires will have better traction- forward and backward.
Now, throw snow into the picture--- changes it --- 2 Snow tires will always be better.


2000 Ford SuperDuty F-350 Powerstroke,Dually.C.C.,.The Tow Monster
2005 Open Road 357RLDS
Prodigy Brake Controller">
Honda EU3000is Generator
Raytek ,,Garmin 7735/GPS
Doran Mfg-RV360-TPMS
B&W/Companion
Rally's attended so far-21
My Blog
Good Sam Member


Posted By: fj12ryder on 10/23/16 10:46am

All things being equal more tire on the ground, i.e. duals vs single, you'll have more traction with larger tire contact patch. That's why dragsters run humongously wide slicks for the most contact patch they can get.

But it also boils down to the type of surface, wide tires, more contact patch, will do better on sand than thin ties, but wide tires will do worse in the mud or snow.


Howard and Peggy

"Don't Panic"


Posted By: Dayle1 on 10/23/16 05:11pm

bfast54 wrote:

Me Again wrote:

Duals, will have less traction under those conditions, as you have less weight per sq in of tire on the ground. Chris



Nice thought
But---- not alwasys.

2 tires-- have Less ground contact - per sq inch-- than 4 tires.

All things being equal--- 4 tires will have better traction- forward and backward.
Now, throw snow into the picture--- changes it --- 2 Snow tires will always be better.


Chris is correct, less weight per sq. in. of contact means less traction. Simple physics. Designers of race and high performance cars understand the physics, that is why they use active wings to increase downforce (i.e. adding weight) to prevent loss of traction rather than deploying extra tires.


Larry Day
Texas Baptist Men-Retiree Builders since '01
'13 Silverado 3500HD LT 2wd CCSB SRW, custom RKI bed
'19 Starcraft Telluride 292RLS
Rig Photos



Posted By: wilber1 on 10/23/16 05:53pm

Nothing worse in snow than a 2wd dually.


"Never trust a man who has not a single redeeming vice" WSC

2011 RAM 3500 SRW
2015 Grand Design Reflection 303RLS


Posted By: time2roll on 10/23/16 06:04pm

If you are trading to an MDT give it a go but unless you have 4wd you are probably looking at paving the driveway.


Posted By: fj12ryder on 10/23/16 06:43pm

Dayle1 wrote:

Chris is correct, less weight per sq. in. of contact means less traction. Simple physics. Designers of race and high performance cars understand the physics, that is why they use active wings to increase downforce (i.e. adding weight) to prevent loss of traction rather than deploying extra tires.
If that were true, race cars would be using the thinnest tires they could get away with rather than the widest. More tire means more friction surface which means more grip.


Posted By: BenK on 10/23/16 06:55pm

Dry pavement...the more contact the better...

Slippery to off road...depends on what you are driving on and desire either penetration
or flotation

If still on solid pavement...do you wish to float over the water/slush/snow? or
penetrate down back to pavement?

If iced over, do NOT drive or have chains and/or studs ***AND*** go SLOW

If off road in the dirt...how deep is that dirt/gravel/etc? If not
that deep, then penetration through the mud/gravel/dirt/etc down to hard pack

If too deep, then flotation over all that stuff. Either by airing down to create
a larger 'apparent' tire dia and/or have more contact patch with wider tires...or dually

Also, a lot depends on how heavy your vehicle is. If it is very heavy, no way
will it float over that kind of stuff

Airing down for a larger apparent dia begets an apparent tire dia of over 8 FEET
and on some tires...creates a 'cup' at the bottom of the flat-spot

It all depends...


-Ben Picture of my rig
1996 GMC SLT Suburban 3/4 ton K3500/7.4L/4:1/+150Kmiles orig owner...
1980 Chevy Silverado C10/long bed/"BUILT" 5.7L/3:73/1 ton helper springs/+329Kmiles, bought it from dad...
1998 Mazda B2500 (1/2 ton) pickup, 2nd owner...
Praise Dyno Brake equiped and all have "nose bleed" braking!
Previous trucks/offroaders: 40's Jeep restored in mid 60's / 69 DuneBuggy (approx +1K lb: VW pan/200hpCorvair: eng, cam, dual carb'w velocity stacks'n 18" runners, 4spd transaxle) made myself from ground up / 1970 Toyota FJ40 / 1973 K5 Blazer (2dr Tahoe, 1 ton axles front/rear, +255K miles when sold it)...
Sold the boat (looking for another): Trophy with twin 150's...
51 cylinders in household, what's yours?...


Posted By: thomas201 on 10/24/16 10:42am

BenK has got it right. After 30 years in the oilfield mud, sand, ice and snow. I agree with him, it depends. Also the type of ruts if any, and may heaven help you if they used rounded pea gravel on the road. And, is there a dozer or tow truck handy, when you make a mistake.

I have found 4wd and single rears to be the best. Dual rears with 4wd are not bad. Tandems with inter axel locks next (they seem to tear up easy) then single axel duals are the weakest. Lockers really help. By the way, with practice, and working in two man teams, you would be surprised just how quickly you can chain up for bad roads. Say 20 minutes to put on your coveralls, chain up, then strip off your coveralls and have a cup of coffee. I think non 4wd tucks should always have chains, and I often have chains for all four wheels when needed.

Planning is best, and a good pair of well broken in boots, is a good emergency reserve.


Posted By: mkirsch on 10/24/16 11:19am

An empty DRW has LESS traction than an empty SRW. The reason? Roughly the same amount of weight over the rear tires, only twice as many tires.

A DRW loaded to capacity will have MORE traction than an SRW loaded to capacity. The reason? Twice as much weight over twice as many tires.

2WD will get "stuck on wet grass" when you run smooth road tires, don't have a locking differential, and/or have an heavy left foot. More often than not, people create their own problems by romping on the accelerator in sketchy traction situations. I can break a 4x4 loose on wet grass. All I have to do is slam it in gear and stomp on the gas, and I'll be as stuck as any 2WD that does the same thing.

If you're going to be where the traction is sketchy, run traction tires. Don't expect to be able to move in slick conditions without the weight of the trailer over the rear wheels. Make sure you've got a locking differential. For those rare times when you do get truly stuck, have a good tow strap behind the seat.


Putting 10-ply tires on half ton trucks since aught-four.


Posted By: jerem0621 on 10/24/16 12:58pm

My dually (2wd) got stuck on wet grass too...SRW from now on if I can get away with it.


TV-2022 Silverado 2WD
TT - Zinger 270BH
WD Hitch- HaulMaster 1,000 lb Round Bar
Dual Friction bar sway control

It’s Kind of Fun to do the Impossible
~Walt Disney~



Posted By: BenK on 10/25/16 11:59am

Yup...agree with Thomas and add in case no one thought of this for
their chain kit...

5 gallon plastic bucket with lid. Either the once it came with or
after market cover with a cushy top for my tender bottom...am way
older these days... [emoticon]

Bucket is a working stool and keeps the salt/slush/etc inside and
NOT on the vehicle rug

2 cans of WD40 to oil down everything going back into the bucket

Below all in their own plastic bags

Chain repair kit with extra links, chain plyers, bailing wire, BIG tie wraps

Chain tensioners. No longer use rubber bands, but truckers version with
coiled spring (about 1" in dia)

Several sets of gloves. Extra thick nitrile (blue that EMT's use)

Roll of hallway vinyl runner in case have to kneel or lay down to get
the back side. Rolled up along the inside dia so not in the way, as
not
used often

$0.99 tools from the hardware store sale table. Plyers (two, one a needle
nose, other lineman with a big wire cutter), screw drivers, etc....toss
them when they get too rusty (not often)

At home, take them all out and hose them down. Hang them to dry and
repeat another coating of WD40




thomas201 wrote:

BenK has got it right. After 30 years in the oilfield mud, sand, ice and snow. I agree with him, it depends. Also the type of ruts if any, and may heaven help you if they used rounded pea gravel on the road. And, is there a dozer or tow truck handy, when you make a mistake.

I have found 4wd and single rears to be the best. Dual rears with 4wd are not bad. Tandems with inter axel locks next (they seem to tear up easy) then single axel duals are the weakest. Lockers really help. By the way, with practice, and working in two man teams, you would be surprised just how quickly you can chain up for bad roads. Say 20 minutes to put on your coveralls, chain up, then strip off your coveralls and have a cup of coffee. I think non 4wd tucks should always have chains, and I often have chains for all four wheels when needed.

Planning is best, and a good pair of well broken in boots, is a good emergency reserve.



Posted By: Turtle n Peeps on 10/25/16 01:11pm

Maybe this guy has the answer? [emoticon]

In all seriousness Ben hit it on the money.

It all depends on the surface. Sometimes you want to dig, sometimes you want to float and all times you want to grip.


~ Too many freaks & not enough circuses ~


"Life is not tried ~ it is merely survived ~ if you're standing
outside the fire"

"The best way to get a bad law repealed is to enforce it strictly."- Abraham Lincoln



Print  |  Close