Coast Resorts Open Roads Forum: Beginning RVing: CCA on a battery
Open Roads Forum Already a member? Login here.   If not, Register Today!  |  Help

Newest  |  Active  |  Popular  |  RVing FAQ Forum Rules  |  Forum Help and Support  |  Contact

Search:   Advanced Search

Search only in Beginning RVing

Open Roads Forum  >  Beginning RVing

 > CCA on a battery

Reply to Topic  |  Subscribe  |  Print Topic  |  Post New Topic  | 
Page of 5  
Prev
full_mosey

Oklahoma

Senior Member

Joined: 01/16/2011

View Profile


Offline
Posted: 02/05/12 04:25pm Link  |  Quote  |  Print  |  Notify Moderator

mike4947 wrote:

The major objection I have with Optima batteries is their price versus their capacity.
They are made with curved plates which will hold up better to vibration and shock loading than your regular flat plate battery, But the manufacturing cost is quite a bit higher. Which translates into a higher selling price per amp.
Also that for any equal sized battery..ie group 24, group 27, etc they have apx 70 percent of the capacity in amps as your "regular" AGM or flooded cell battery.
Since I have no intension of taking an RV offshore boating or motocross racing I'll stick with the lower cost AGM's like Concorde/Lifeline or regular flooded deep cycles.


I agree that the Optima is too pricey as a DC service battery.

I do have a three year old Deka AGM grp24 79AH that I prefer over the Optima for DC service. The Deka has Bass-Pro decals. It has served me well.

I cannot use flooded due to living space issues.

HTH;
John

Campalong

Edmonton, AB

Full Member

Joined: 06/05/2008

View Profile


Offline
Posted: 02/05/12 09:35pm Link  |  Quote  |  Print  |  Notify Moderator

Soooo, in summary:

Dry camper = battery with plenty o' AH.
Non-dry camper ie. myself = at minimum, starter/deep cycle.
Gotcha

Saltwater buck

Brazoria

New Member

Joined: 07/01/2011

View Profile



Good Sam RV Club Member

Offline
Posted: 02/06/12 01:20pm Link  |  Quote  |  Print  |  Notify Moderator

Sorry, it's a yellow top. Specs: CA 870, CCA 650, AH 55, RC 120.


2008 kestone sprinter
2010 Dodge 2500 4x4
Amateur Radio KE5ZQC

Ron3rd

Upland, CA USA

Senior Member

Joined: 03/22/2004

View Profile


Offline
Posted: 02/07/12 07:31am Link  |  Quote  |  Print  |  Notify Moderator

Campalong wrote:

Soooo, in summary:

Dry camper = battery with plenty o' AH.
Non-dry camper ie. myself = at minimum, starter/deep cycle.
Gotcha


Yes, for your limited use, the deep cycle/marine will work fine. Install 2 of them if you can and you'll like 'em even more.


2007 Tundra SR5 CrewMax 5.7 V8
2004 Aljo 250LT
Eaz-Lift WD Hitch
Single Friction Sway Control
Prodigy Brake Controller
Honda EU2000

"I have this plan to live forever; so far my plan is working"

bryanl

Reno, NV

Senior Member

Joined: 12/25/2003

View Profile



Posted: 02/08/12 10:53pm Link  |  Quote  |  Print  |  Notify Moderator

It is interesting that the simple question of asking for objective definition and useful empirical measure generates such scorn ....

re: "I totally agree, although I am sure Bryan will be back in with "no such thing as a true deep cycle battery"." -- not what I assert. What I do is to ask for a definition to match the label that has use to an RVer looking to purchase a battery. Does that label mean a longer warranty? Not that I can see. Does it indicate a greater energy density? Not that I can see. Why is it that such a simple question only gets this sort of comment and no productive response?

re: "So Bryan, just how do you use your batteries to not take them below 50%?" -- what I suggest you do is to head over to http://www.smartgauge.co.uk/ and look through Chris's technical documents for the analysis regarding the optimum discharge cycle depth for best cost effectiveness. Then consider the reserve requirements necessary for RV use. Then take a look at the available battery energy capacity compared to the variables involved and usage patterns to gain some insight into why RV use profiles generally involve cycle depths much less than 50% SoC.

re: "on another thread, you just stated that driving for many (100+) hours with full batteries seeing 14.1+ volts would not affect battery life. If that was the case, you wouldn't need a multistep charger other times. So what do you think about the high voltage while driving, and what do you do about it." -- I sure wish some folks would think first and respond later .... Consider, for example, how many TT folks have batteries connected in parallel with the engine batteries while on the road; why it is that engine batteries usually have much better warranties than house batteries, and the precision required for battery charging.

re: "There are batteries that can be deeply discharged without hurting them, i.e. "deep cycle", and batteries that can not be deeply discharged unless you want them to die quickly." -- they aren't lead acid! NiFe or Li ion might do but the costs vs benefits tends to keep us using lead acid batteries.


Bryan

booster

Minnesota

Senior Member

Joined: 10/14/2007

View Profile



Posted: 02/13/12 12:15pm Link  |  Quote  |  Print  |  Notify Moderator

bryanl wrote:

It is interesting that the simple question of asking for objective definition and useful empirical measure generates such scorn ....

re: "I totally agree, although I am sure Bryan will be back in with "no such thing as a true deep cycle battery"." -- not what I assert. What I do is to ask for a definition to match the label that has use to an RVer looking to purchase a battery. Does that label mean a longer warranty? Not that I can see. Does it indicate a greater energy density? Not that I can see. Why is it that such a simple question only gets this sort of comment and no productive response?Folks have repeatedly given you definitions of "true deep cycle" batteries, but you refuse to accept them. Last time I looked, warranties didn't determine the type of battery, so what do you mean? Energy density is also not a valid point, as it is the durability at the intended usage that is the major factor in style of battery. Your responses don't relate to the issues. You have consistently denied that what others (including mfgs) define as a true deep cycle battery has any benefit in the RV world.

re: "So Bryan, just how do you use your batteries to not take them below 50%?" -- what I suggest you do is to head over to http://www.smartgauge.co.uk/ and look through Chris's technical documents for the analysis regarding the optimum discharge cycle depth for best cost effectiveness. Then consider the reserve requirements necessary for RV use. Then take a look at the available battery energy capacity compared to the variables involved and usage patterns to gain some insight into why RV use profiles generally involve cycle depths much less than 50% SoC.Impressive diatribe, but you again totally ignored the the question. I have done all those calculations, and that is how I know many, many, folks would have to make major camping style concessions that are not really necessary. I just want to know how you do it.

re: "on another thread, you just stated that driving for many (100+) hours with full batteries seeing 14.1+ volts would not affect battery life. If that was the case, you wouldn't need a multistep charger other times. So what do you think about the high voltage while driving, and what do you do about it." -- I sure wish some folks would think first and respond later .... Consider, for example, how many TT folks have batteries connected in parallel with the engine batteries while on the road; why it is that engine batteries usually have much better warranties than house batteries, and the precision required for battery charging. So I should think about what you said on the other thread, OK, just did, and that is what you said. Sure trailer folks may be disconnected from the alternator (or not), but they don't get charged while driving then, and must find a place to plug in, or they will, God forbid, go under 50% SOC. How do you handle that when booddocking? But you must consider a lot of motorhomes do connect to the alternator while driving. This is a real problem, and you can't just say it doesn't exist, because you don't want to answer the question. As to warranties, they mean pretty much nothing, as most are sales gimmicks. They count on you losing the paperwork before the battery fails. Any battery that is cycled deeper is going to have a shorter life. Your house batteries go way deeper than the starting battery, which should have very shallow discharges, and is designed to handle higher voltage better (not well) than deep cycles are (different lead compound).


LLeopold

Camarillo, CA USA

Moderator

Joined: 06/19/2001

View Profile



Good Sam RV Club Member

Offline
Posted: 02/13/12 04:40pm Link  |  Quote  |  Print  |  Notify Moderator

Let's not let things get personal, folks. Take any personal issues off-line. First, and only, warning.

bryanl

Reno, NV

Senior Member

Joined: 12/25/2003

View Profile



Posted: 02/14/12 05:58pm Link  |  Quote  |  Print  |  Notify Moderator

it'd really help if the quoting was done properly so reply was distinct from response.

re: "Let's not let things get personal, folks. Take any personal issues off-line. First, and only, warning." -- thanks. It makes for quite a slog when that sort of thing clouds a discussion.

re: "Folks have repeatedly given you definitions of "true deep cycle" batteries, but you refuse to accept them." -- an objective, pertinent definition? One that actually means anything to RV service? One backed by something I can measure? Where?

re: "Last time I looked, warranties didn't determine the type of battery," -- take a look at what you can get for a battery for your car (5-7 years). Compare to what is available for RV house batteries (maybe 3 years). Compare to what is available for industrial and commercial use batteries (maybe 3 months).

re: "Energy density is also not a valid point, as it is the durability at the intended usage that is the major factor in style of battery." -- but energy density is often falsely cited as a feature for deep cycle and durability has no measure other than, perhaps, warranty. (and, if the NAWS FAQ is of any value, there isn't any distinctive life difference, either).

re: "You have consistently denied that what others (including mfgs) define as a true deep cycle battery has any benefit in the RV world." -- what I am asking for is a proper definition that is of use to an RVer looking for a battery - one supported by an objective measure that is useful for RV usage. The terms 'deep cycle' and 'RV/Marine' have no specification or measure behind them that will distinguish them from any other in any usable way. The terms do imply the target market for the battery and they do usually imply warranty terms.

re: "I have done all those calculations, and that is how I know many, many, folks would have to make major camping style concessions that are not really necessary. I just want to know how you do it." -- lead acid battery energy density is rather low and RV's can't carry more than a kWh or so of available energy in battery. That compares to the 30 kWh average daily household use. I have seen a number of discussions where folks have had a bit of trouble bridging that gap.

The other item to note is the lab cycle life versus cycle depth charts. Again, the NAWS FAQ has a good synopsis on this. The thing to keep in mind is that even an SLI battery will handle moderate cycle depths for more cycles than there are weekends in typical 5 year battery life. That is why you can find some folks on these forums who are quite happy using SLI batteries for their RV house batteries.

re: "As to warranties, they mean pretty much nothing, as most are sales gimmicks. They count on you losing the paperwork before the battery fails." -- One of the reasons I suggest buying from a reputable retailer is that they often don't require much in terms of paperwork, especially for their house brand batteries. But then, if you don't keep the papers for registration, insurance, tire warranties, maintenance schedules, and other such things, I think you need to put some attention towards vehicle documentation management.

Reply to Topic  |  Subscribe  |  Print Topic  |  Post New Topic  | 
Page of 5  
Prev

Open Roads Forum  >  Beginning RVing

 > CCA on a battery
Search:   Advanced Search

Search only in Beginning RVing


New posts No new posts
Closed, new posts Closed, no new posts
Moved, new posts Moved, no new posts

Adjust text size:

© 2012 Coast Resorts | Terms & Conditions | PRIVACY POLICY | YOUR PRIVACY RIGHTS