bkirkpatrick

Brea / Orange County, CA

Senior Member

Joined: 01/03/2004

View Profile

Offline
|
Which is better: Higher or lower volt solar panels? I am looking at two different solar panels... both put out about 7.75 amps but one is a 29v (240 watt) and the other is a 36v (270 watt) panel. They are both around the 2.00/watt range. I heard that a MMPT controller will convert the higher volts to more amps. Or is that already factored into the amps on the sticker which would make the 36v panel more inefficient?
I am actually looking at putting about 1000w (or 20+ amps) on my rig but would like a good solar controller and a remote monitor. Any suggestions from the solar gurus here? Thanks, Brendan
Raptor - Modifications
|
TechWriter

Green Bay, WI USA

Senior Member

Joined: 12/22/2002

View Profile

|
bkirkpatrick wrote: Which is better: Higher or lower volt solar panels?
Higher voltage - less I^2R loss + more of a chance your array will exceed battery bank voltage.
This info from Jack Mayer's site and MidNite Solar forum.
For a controller, look at MidNite's Classic.
2001 Newmar Mountain Aire 4095 DP
Wisconsin, USA
|
mena661

Southern California

Senior Member

Joined: 03/21/2009

View Profile

Offline
|
You can use smaller gauge wire with higher voltage panels. Also, they tend to be cheaper than 12V panels.
2006 Ford F250 Lariat 6.0 PSD 2WD
2010 Keystone Outback Super-Lite 285FL 5er, Reese Signature Series 18K w/Manual Slider
Four Trojan L16 6V's (740Ah)
|
sonicsix

Jerry n' Cynthia

Senior Member

Joined: 10/11/2008

View Profile


Good Sam RV Club Member
|
My panels put a consistent 20v into my MPPT controller. Very pleased with the setup. Make sure your controller can handle the volts you throw at it.
http://rvroadtrip.us/library/solar_install.php
Full Time RVing Blog -- RV Mods and Upgrades -- http://RVnumber.com?1
2004 Gulf Stream 6236 24' Class C towing a 1999 Jeep Cherokee 4x4
|
pianotuna

Regina, SK, Canada

Senior Member

Joined: 12/18/2004

View Profile

Offline
|
Hi,
Look not at amps but at watts, or "power". Efficiency between the two panels is probably nearly identical. To choose look at cost per watt.
Since both panels would require an mppt controller, I'd choose the higher voltage. If staying below 500 watts maximum, my favorite controller is the Rogue 3024.
Above 500 watts I'd go to the Morningstar 60 amp MPPT unit.
From the midnight solar site:
"NOTE ON HIGH VOLTAGE-HIGH POWER INPUT SOURCES... When using an unlimited power source, it is recommended that the input voltage not be much higher than 4 or 5 times the output (battery) voltage. i.e. Don't try to charge a 12V battery from an unlimited input power source sitting at, say, 200 Volts."
* This post was
last
edited 01/11/12 08:25am by pianotuna *
View edit history
Regards, Don
Kustom Koach Class C 28'5" 256 watts solar, 875 amp hours in two battery banks 12 volt batteries 2500 watt inverter.
|
|
|
Salvo

California

Senior Member

Joined: 06/01/2008

View Profile

Offline
|
Shade is the biggest killer of solar current. Forget about the minor advantage higher voltage has on IR losses. The greater the number of solar cells in series, the worst shade will effect current. Or, the lower the voltage the more shade tolerant the system is.
A lot of people say they won't park in shade or partial shade. But they will.
|
Salvo

California

Senior Member

Joined: 06/01/2008

View Profile

Offline
|
I believe what they are getting at is efficiency. IIRC, lower voltage MPPT controllers are more efficient.
pianotuna wrote:
From the midnight solar site:
"NOTE ON HIGH VOLTAGE-HIGH POWER INPUT SOURCES... When using an unlimited power source, it is recommended that the input voltage not be much higher than 4 or 5 times the output (battery) voltage. i.e. Don't try to charge a 12V battery from an unlimited input power source sitting at, say, 200 Volts."
|
pianotuna

Regina, SK, Canada

Senior Member

Joined: 12/18/2004

View Profile

Offline
|
Hi Salvo,
Yes that's true about the higher the voltage the lower the efficiency--but the only information I've seen about that is at the Rogue site shows 96% after about 26 volts? (working from a faulty memory so it may be slightly higher)
|
Salvo

California

Senior Member

Joined: 06/01/2008

View Profile

Offline
|
The Rogue spec states a 17V panel is 1% more efficient than a 34V panel.
A 51V panel (if the controller can operate at this voltage) is probably more than 2% less efficient.
So much for the argument go higher voltage and reduce IR drop in the cable. You can always get a bigger cable. You can't do anything to help converter efficiency (other than keeping voltage low).
Sal
|
TechWriter

Green Bay, WI USA

Senior Member

Joined: 12/22/2002

View Profile

|
Salvo wrote: . . .the lower the voltage the more shade tolerant the system is . . .
So a 0V system would be the best, right?
|
|
|